Add new worlds/ and World offical types to databases

[StormyFae]

On a technical level it wouldn't. A mature server by itself isn't bringing any content to the game that would force a re-classification by the ESRB/etc (as anything it does bring would be purely player-interaction related, which isn't rated by the ESRB), which only rates the actual game-dev content of the game. Hence the little disclaimer of 'online interactions not rated by the ESRB' they tag on to online games.

Mollusk's reasoning would be far more accurate here, where trying to explain why a server with the tag of 'mature' exists would be a PR nightmare, or trying to explain that 'mature' means much more than just adults rubbing against each other.

not really...

can basically make a secondary agreement for just those that can cover it completely and make it enter at your own risk basically

[TheMightyMollusk]

not really...

can basically make a secondary agreement for just those that can cover it completely and make it enter at your own risk basically

And then one gaming journalist decides to interpret that as SE endorsing that behavior, they make an article, it goes viral, boom, PR nightmare. It's not gonna happen.

[StormyFae]

And then one gaming journalist decides to interpret that as SE endorsing that behavior, they make an article, it goes viral, boom, PR nightmare. It's not gonna happen.

Almlst noone gives a crap about the journelist most their stuff is hs and everyone knows it.. Very few ppl even read that trash so it really wouldnt it, worrying what some do with it like that doesnt matter abd shouldnt happan

[MilkieTea]

Almlst noone gives a crap about the journelist most their stuff is hs and everyone knows it.. Very few ppl even read that trash so it really wouldnt it, worrying what some do with it like that doesnt matter abd shouldnt happan

It takes one somewhat high-profile person to make a single tweet about a single link to spread that ish like wildfire. No thanks.