Post your weirdest glamours

[Nicodemus_Mercy]

While I don't think it's particularly "weird" in the sense of being absurd or outlandish, but more in the sense of being unusual for the job I main, which is White Mage. Here's the glam:

[Vyrerus]

This was my race and glam for the end of Deltascape Savage. My group's morale was low, and I convinced them all to glam into Coeurl speedos and other ridiculous things till we beat it. We beat it like two raid nights later in our speedos.

[WhiteArchmage]

This was my race and glam for the end of Deltascape Savage. My group's morale was low, and I convinced them all to glam into Coeurl speedos and other ridiculous things till we beat it. We beat it like two raid nights later in our speedos.

HAH! My static does the same. Whenever we're having too much trouble with a fight we just get into silly glams, or go all in cowls like we're in a cult.



This is from another clear but we'd split our Leviathan teams with "Black yukata" and "Red Yukata", that time we just went in Yukata and Hapi... except for the traitor frog in the back.

[Vyrerus]

HAH! My static does the same.

Those rainbow cowls are on fleek. Or whatever the youth says these days. Was it... full of drip?

I don't know. It's cool. I like it. I'm old. Blergh!

[WhiteArchmage]

Those rainbow cowls are on fleek. Or whatever the youth says these days. Was it... full of drip?

tbh, whenever I see that screenshot I get the urge to burst out singing A Chorus Line lol

[ItMe]

What a fantastic image <3
I'm saving this to use it as a reaction image in my FC discord.

[Jijifli]

It may only really matter in PvP, but then again ...

Except PvP is where it'd matter the least as it's literally written above your name for everyone else what your class is, rather than your actual name. If you're playing a SCH, everyone is going to see "SCHOLAR" or "SCH" above your head, weather you're in sch gear, brd gear, or naked. As a reminder you can... just be naked in pvp, great information.

[Raikai]

The problem is, the 'official' argument for why glams are restricted is something like 'so players can tell who is what class at a glance'. That argument shatters like sugar-glass before a sledgehammer when you realize these unrestricted glam pieces exist.

O.O Is that even an argument?

Practially half of the glams provided in game are All Classes.

And even the ones that aren't... The designs more often than not dilute the notion of heavy/light armor. See YoHRa sets... Everything looks caster gear, period. Or the Law's Order sets where everything looks like tank heavy armor.

Honestly, I think if anyone still holds this argument of "knowing at glance", they are either playing a fool or just delusional, lol.

The only restriction that still makes sense is Job exclusive geear, because they are signature pieces.

[Ayazi_Qestir]

O.O Is that even an argument?

Practially half of the glams provided in game are All Classes.

And even the ones that aren't... The designs more often than not dilute the notion of heavy/light armor. See YoHRa sets... Everything looks caster gear, period. Or the Law's Order sets where everything looks like tank heavy armor.

Honestly, I think if anyone still holds this argument of "knowing at glance", they are either playing a fool or just delusional, lol.

The only restriction that still makes sense is Job exclusive geear, because they are signature pieces.

Yeah, most XIV players kinda knew it was a load of chocobo dung the moment the devs spoke it, but they've essentially doubled-down, refusing to give an actual reason for it. Hence my creation of this thread.

[Iscah]

Yeah, most XIV players kinda knew it was a load of chocobo dung the moment the devs spoke it, but they've essentially doubled-down, refusing to give an actual reason for it. Hence my creation of this thread.

I continue to believe that they know it's just a polite deflection and really it's because they either can't do it at all or can't selectively keep artifact glamours job-locked while allowing everything else. So instead of saying they can't, they try to suggest that you shouldn't want it anyway.