I'm fairly certain that this is supposed to more representative of bias in reconstructing history through archaeology rather than "yep you were in fact definitely right." Plus as Ryu pointed out, very few of the events are actually mutually exclusive.It wouldn't be so bad if it was just people taking our choice as fact, the issue is that after each the quest, the next one then notes that they went on to find more slates that proves your choice was fact, so if I picked optimism and you pick realist, both our versions are right within our story, that's what I meant about divergence by going out of their way to say you're 100% right in your choice and things did in fact play out just as your choice dictated they've created different versions of Ronka's history, so I just don't see them going back and doing much with it now.
We might still get some stuff on Ronka if the story ever takes us back to the first, but I doubt they'll go anywhere near anything that the tribes story touched.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.