Quote Originally Posted by Kaurhz View Post
It is publicly disclosing the possibility of it, which makes it open to those who are considered vulnerable/minors. So I am inclined to say that it could be interpreted as violating 3.3 (Agree to act accordingly. - I hope you don't plan on arguing against this point). Since I didn't make it clear and worded it poorly. Let's say it creates an easily accessible situation whereby a minor would have access to something they otherwise quite arguably shouldn't, which arguably violates clause 3.6. Whether or not it specifies 18+ doesn't matter. There's nothing actually enforcing it.
This is a valid point and would be acceptable if this was the way it was presented to me by the GM, but this isn't the reasoning he gave me, and the violating of 3.3 to me seems like an arbitrary choice given a lack of available, more relevant options to cite me with. No where in my conversation with the GM last night did he mention any of this. I do understand your point, though.