Gil stolen through market board

[TurtlesAWD]

have you never heard of the royal you, chief? or do you just assume every comment in this thread is a personal attack on you specifically?

You... think I'm royalty? Bro. I'm flattered. Confused, but flattered! Anyway I'm not a monarchist.

But yes, that aside, you quoted a post of mine and said "you auto clicked your money out of your pockets because you couldn't be bothered to watch what it was doing. probably should just eat the L, instead of drawing attention to it. " - this is a direct quote from your post, where you are talking specifically to me as though you believe I'm the original poster, so truth told I'm not sure what you're talking about. Perhaps you can clarify.

ToS is still clear on this. Crystal clear on this. And even if not, as stated before, the Devs have outright said they will not ban those using tools to facilitate NORMAL gameplay.

Regardless of how you personally feel, this matter is not up for debate AT ALL. And I've no idea why you brought this matter up in a thread about someone who CLEARLY was using automated gameplay mechanics, not assistive gameplay mechanics.

I mean... OP's account is apparently still active. And my position is, as it has been this entire time, that it's probably more worthwile to fix the system than punish a specific user, particularly if the grounds for punishing them are shaky in the first place, based on a lack of clear distinction between their chosen method of circumvention versus any that would be hardware based for the same result, given that the purpose of rules in the abstract is not to cherry pick who they apply to or to support a situation where players enact punishment for an infraction.

Like I'm not... trying to argue that someone shouldn't have been banned? Because nobody got banned. I'm trying to explain the reality we live in, one where that didn't occur, and provide what just might be the reason it didn't occur, and why we shouldn't want it to occur, in favor of something different in the future which would be better for everyone. I don't think this is actually that controversial of a statement except maybe for folks like mister damage-control-over-obvious-case-of-mistaken-identity up there who just wants to see some blood.