Why don't we hear about egi glamours anymore?

[Styrmwyda]

Note that they were easily able to make Carbuncle Egi Glamours because they already have models for Carbuncles, while the only other Egi model they have is Sephirot-Egi from the 60-70 SMN questline.

[OvernightSiren]

Note that they were easily able to make Carbuncle Egi Glamours because they already have models for Carbuncles, while the only other Egi model they have is Sephirot-Egi from the 60-70 SMN questline.

There are little Ramuh-egis too and they make multiple minions every patch--it's not unreasonable for them to spend time making egi-glamour after almost 10 years.

[ItMe]

What do you mean "nice necro"?

As spf1200 said, you posted on an old thread, and in doing so "brought the thread back to life."
I also agree with them in that it's better to add to existing threads.

[Tint]

Note that they were easily able to make Carbuncle Egi Glamours because they already have models for Carbuncles, while the only other Egi model they have is Sephirot-Egi from the 60-70 SMN questline.

They could at least make it possible to glamour the Titan Egi over the Ifrit Egi and so on.

[Packetdancer]

Note that they were easily able to make Carbuncle Egi Glamours because they already have models for Carbuncles, while the only other Egi model they have is Sephirot-Egi from the 60-70 SMN questline.

I don't even want different glamours. I mean, I do, but at this point I'll be content if they give me a /carbunclesize command akin to /bahamutsize, but make the current carby size the "small" option. Let me have a giant glowing puppy like Diamond in Idyllshire! I want my St. Bernard-sized carbuncle following me around! (Bonus points if they make it so you can target and /pet the carbuncle and have it react.)

But if they did do it properly, I'd love to see egis tied to lore rather than fights. Let us see things like, yes, Sephirot-Egi or Sophia-Egi or other egis based on eikons from long-forgotten ages. (Heck, let summoners finish out 6.0 with Zodiark-Egi and Hydaelyn-Egi as glamour options.)

[Hyperia]

I am betting they are going to remove Egi's as a normal, always out pet, and make them more like the MCH pets that get summoned, do a job then vanish.

[White_Wolf_X]

I am betting they are going to remove Egi's as a normal, always out pet, and make them more like the MCH pets that get summoned, do a job then vanish.

This is kinda what i'm hoping for.

[TheMightyMollusk]

I'd like to see them do the opposite and go full-on into pet class territory, where the summoner gives commands and the pet carries it out, rather than casting spells at all. But the game's net code would make that a nightmare to actually play.

[Styrmwyda]

I am betting they are going to remove Egi's as a normal, always out pet, and make them more like the MCH pets that get summoned, do a job then vanish.

Demi-Bahamut and Demi-Phoenix already fulfill that "temporary pet" role. The lore advantages of Egi is that they can be out indefinitely, while Demi-Primals cannot.

[ItMe]

I'd like to see them do the opposite and go full-on into pet class territory, where the summoner gives commands and the pet carries it out, rather than casting spells at all. But the game's net code would make that a nightmare to actually play.

Maybe they're keeping a full on pet class like this in their pocket for PUP?
(Fingers crossed)