Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Test Server

Dev. Posts

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by Mireille View Post
    My chief reason for wanting to see a test server is so that 2.0 is vetted for playability by players before release and not after. Basically as long as 2.0 is a hit with players it doesn't matter so much how you get there. We can live without a test server in the interim.
    XIV is playable now therefore 2.0 will logically also be playable. What I think you meant the main reason people want a test server is:

    "So we can continue to complain and want to change things certain players personally doesn't like about 2.0 before release so you guys can push 2.0 even further away to meet our demands. For example if we find out Crystal Tower is open world, that's not playable, it needs to be instanced!"

    That's a bit more accurate than actual playability (It's not a new game, it's a new client.)

    Quote Originally Posted by Resheph View Post
    Would test server characters start at 50, or some other level depending on the content being tested?
    You can adjust your parameters and triggers on a test server that isn't being treated like a glorified sneak peek.
    (0)

  2. #2
    Player
    Geesus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    1,122
    Character
    Geesus Ravenheart
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Lancer Lv 70
    Quote Originally Posted by Elexia View Post
    "So we can continue to complain and want to change things certain players personally doesn't like about 2.0 before release so you guys can push 2.0 even further away to meet our demands. For example if we find out Crystal Tower is open world, that's not playable, it needs to be instanced!"
    Actually I think she meant what Delus said:
    Quote Originally Posted by Delsus View Post
    I would agree with what has been said, a 2.0 test server as soon as the client has been released will be beneficial to both SE and the players, we will get the chance to give feedback, and as long as it is acted upon (unlike the origanal alpha and beta) it should get better reviews.
    And I would tend to agree. If the original testers were ignored and Yoshi and the Devs learned from that experience, this would seem to be the logical choice prior to Re-Launch and hopefully a success and not another failure.

    I get what your saying Elexia and I would like to believe that WON'T happen with the complaining; now with most of the QQers gone now.
    (1)

  3. #3
    Player
    Mireille's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    319
    Character
    Mireille Celestine
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Scholar Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by Elexia View Post
    "So we can continue to complain and want to change things certain players personally doesn't like about 2.0 before release so you guys can push 2.0 even further away to meet our demands. For example if we find out Crystal Tower is open world, that's not playable, it needs to be instanced!"

    No I said exactly what it was I meant. I don't want a bunch of new players to play 2.0 for 8 days and then say this sucks and leave the way they did with 1.0. If they accomplish this another way, say by bringing a group of ordinary gamers in house and make them sign NDI's before testing, that's fine too.

    Kindly don't put words in my mouth that I didn't say.
    (2)

  4. #4
    Player
    Mireille's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    319
    Character
    Mireille Celestine
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Scholar Lv 60
    Sorry this was a double post. I thought the first one didn't post. Deleted post contents since it was the same as the first one.
    (0)
    Last edited by Mireille; 02-08-2012 at 12:00 PM.