Quote Originally Posted by Almagnus1 View Post
Why are you in favor of wasting 6% of the housing?
The fact that you are so nit picky over small numbers like 1 to 3 people in an FC or 6% makes it very clear why you completely dodged the main question I asked you as a followup to when you drilled another user in this thread over how everyone with less than 4 people in an FC should have their house taken away. You clearly have no rational argument to support your insane reasoning. In favor of 6% housing you say? 6% is such an insignificant number that only someone like you looking to pick a fight over every little pebble would irrationally concern themselves over. Hell you'd probably even cry over 1% if you had to just to push your meaningless opinion war.

Let me re-post the question you completely dodged so you can think about it again and so we can stay on the topic at hand.

Quote Originally Posted by PewPewPewPewPew View Post
Please explain why you think the number of people in an FC correlates with the proficiency of that FC and the effectiveness/activity level of that FC. And why that number being over 4 is so specifically the difference between being deserving of a house and not. There are 3-man FCs that are more effective and active than some 50-man FCs.