This should stop the FC abuse or at the least put them on the same footing as private home owners. It's about time.
Skybuilder Ranking Titles/Achievements and Additional Housing
https://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/lodes...8d38461c5ae127
This should stop the FC abuse or at the least put them on the same footing as private home owners. It's about time.
Skybuilder Ranking Titles/Achievements and Additional Housing
https://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/lodes...8d38461c5ae127
Lol, when Lodestone data indicates FCs only own ~30% of the housing on NA servers- sure FCs are the issue.This should stop the FC abuse or at the least put them on the same footing as private home owners. It's about time.
Skybuilder Ranking Titles/Achievements and Additional Housing
https://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/lodes...8d38461c5ae127
Waiting for the salt from 2 groups of people:
1. "OMG, Yoshi P, why only 3 wards?!"
2. "OMG Yoshi P, why did you make it free for all, my FC couldn't get a medium/large?!"
I'm not sure what you're trying to achieve here. I think everyone expects for there to be far less fc houses than private houses for the simple fact that there are significantly more individual players than fcs.
Also something doesn't need to entirely dominate a situation to be an issue. If one person in a group of ten is a bully...that doesn't make the bully's actions not be an issue just because they're in a minority.
And well I'm not saying fcs themselves are an issue, assuming they are legitimate fcs. However shell fcs are an issue.
Because people keep framing this as shell FCs taking up wards of housing depriving individual players of housing, when that ~30% number includes both legit FCs and shell FCs.
The persistent ward housing system is bad with coping with increasing player populations as this freeze demonstrates.
Even in a free for all situation like this, not every individual player who wants a house, is gonna get a house. Especially not on a high pop server.
Adding new wards is kicking the can down the road.
A more feasible solution would be to ask SE to improve upon apartments. Let us upgrade them for gil to penthouses/condos with balconies for gardening/workshop access.
Well...they are...this isn't a theory. This is something that actually happens. There are many reasons why players don't have access to houses and one of those is because of some players/fcs creating shell fcs. But of course the core issue is SE themselves and the awful system they gave us. It just so happens some people are making a bad situation worse.
Completely agree.
Again I completely agree. Doing this could dramatically improve the housing situation and without even needing to add new wards.
30 percent is a huge number for FC's. Seems to me that number should be no more than 20 percent. Glad SE has seen the abuse and the unfairness for private owner purchases and is at least for this go around trying to offer private owners some relief. i have a good number of friends who are happy as can be with the news
Last edited by LaylaTsarra; 08-29-2020 at 01:39 AM.
Yes, punish FC owners and FCs in general for wanting a house (that actively gives them exclusive systems, a la Workshop / Airship stuff) when some private owner could want it to just collect dust.30 percent is a huge number for FC's. Seems to me that number should be no more than 20 percent. Glad SE has seen the abuse and the unfairness for private owner purchases and is at least for this go around trying to offer private owners some relief. i have a good number of friends who are happy as can be with the news
Boy, what a good thing to do! It's so unfair for FCs to be given priority in new housing (because it affects more than one person usually) when Mr (or Mrs) Insignificant wants their own house to neglect!
30% is not huge.30 percent is a huge number for FC's. Seems to me that number should be no more than 20 percent. Glad SE has seen the abuse and the unfairness for private owner purchases and is at least for this go around trying to offer private owners some relief. i have a good number of friends who are happy as can be with the news
30% is also not huge when you realize that FC homes are meant to service more than one person. If you believe all 30% of those houses to be single owners, then that's hugely unreasonable.
FC's create communities & bring people together. While private houses are often just empty and unused. SE is making the right decision not punishing FC's simply because they make sure more players have a reason to resub through the fun you experience with them. Can "private" house owners say the same and claim they entertain a large amount of players? Nope, cuss they can only share houses with up to 2 or 3 people at the very most. If it were up to me private houses would be limited to apartments & FC rooms and 1/3rd of all small houses would become mediums and large houses would double. So consider yourself lucky you even have the option of aquiring a house that in my opinion could be put to better use in the hands of Fc's that bring people together.
I find it interesting that people think when an FC wants a house, it's obviously because they want to use it to entertain others, use FC facilities, and generally be Upstanding Citizens. But someone wants a private house? Well, they just plan to leave it empty anyway. What a waste.
Just that black and white thinking at it again.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.