Quote Originally Posted by JohnSpawnVFX View Post
And we're back to obsfucating and pretending people misinterpreted you.

Quote Originally Posted by yotsuffy View Post
Playing BLU to have access to skills giving a clear advantage over all the other players with whom one is in competition is the abuse of an exploit.
You said it, you didn't quote anyone and we're replying to them, no one changed the quote to twist what you said. No one's putting any words you didn't say in your mouth. They came straight from the source.

Quote Originally Posted by yotsuffy View Post
Playing BLU to have access to skills giving a clear advantage over all the other players with whom one is in competition is the abuse of an exploit.
Quote Originally Posted by yotsuffy View Post
Playing BLU to have access to skills giving a clear advantage over all the other players with whom one is in competition is the abuse of an exploit.
Quote Originally Posted by yotsuffy View Post
Playing BLU to have access to skills giving a clear advantage over all the other players with whom one is in competition is the abuse of an exploit.
Ahh okay. You really can't read.
I mean, you might be deciphering the letters but you don't understand the words they form!

I was going to say this: "Quoting someone partially to make him say something other than what he says in his full speech is ... at a minimum ... bad faith."

But, in fact, you don't understand what you're reading!

If someone says:
Playing BLU to have access to skills giving a clear advantage over all the other players with whom one is in competition is the abuse of an exploit.
you really think it means the same as:
Playing BLU is the abuse of an exploit.
I am sorry. You don't understand it, but all those extra words that are in the first sentence and not in the second make these two sentences not say the same thing at all!

Likewise, we can effectively give weight to something by repeating it, but we cannot make it change meaning by repeating it. I'm sorry, it doesn't work that way.