First let me thank you for a valid point you are making without attacking me making some assumption about lack of control, economic feasibility, or entitlement. Instead, you are bringing a positive to timed events vs trying to make an assumption about me. It's refreshing and much appreciated.
I feel like this is a fair argument. I would say that limited time events may bring more people in that might not have done it but, like myself, it also keeps people away. The Garo event lasted over a year if I remember correctly, it was a long-ass time. Also, the yokai watch event has been brought back several times because people didn't get to participate. This is the 3rd yokai watch event... Why double standards on these things and not other things. I mean I don't care if events come back at all that isn't my point. I just don't think the exclusive bragging rights of the 100 weigh more than the number of potential players that might want to do the content for these rewards and be able to obtain rewards from past seasons. While my posts bring up more than time-events, it clear if you read people signatures on these forums and been apart of this community for a while people have wanted the PVP mounts. Like, you have to have skill and determination to get these mounts even if they weren't locked behind a specific time you wouldn't be guaranteed to get them. If the top 100 wanted to keep it exclusive they could just make sure they are in the top 100 again and again. I would say the same skill and determination are needed for something like clearing an ultimate trail or something else that is considered high end. People can do those years later and get the same titles. Why aren't ultimates time-gated. The producer has said several times, go take a break and play other games but then turns around and says hey you weren't here then so you miss out.


Reply With Quote




