And my point is that the severity of the potential abuse matters a lot. We have a vote kick that actually does get abused quite a bit by preformed parties. We have people who abuse roulettes by MAKING others kick them out of instances they don't want to do. We have people who abuse Mentor chat moderation privileges. We have people who abuse others using certain emotes.
The abuse potential of this particular suggested feature is extremely limited. Especially if suggestions in this thread are used (limit name displays to first initials, change model to "default random"). I honestly cannot think of what "discrimination" potential you're thinking of. Discriminate against who.. people who cannot stand to NOT make people see their online avatar? The reason they full stop will not do "teenage" characters or younger is it potentially facilitates actual illegal activities.
It's not discrimination to not want someone in your party, or want to interact with them, or not approve of their choices. This feature does not facilitate anything other than personal choice.



Reply With Quote


. But yes, there's nothing to talk about anymore.. tho in my opinion the moment she mentioned the whole men in dresses bit there was nothing to discuss there either. As far as the likes go... yeah 150 or whatever it was on a forum where only so many come too in the first place is still nothing to boost about I think. And like the other poster said a post that was in the other direction has more likes, so if going by that OP still loses honestly. But likes doesn't mean anything when only like 2% of the entire playerbase even comes here.


