Square Enix, Bulge Slider for male and female please?

[myahele]

This is a family friendly game, so I doubt they'd ever release something like that

[Lunalepsy]

This is a family friendly game, so I doubt they'd ever release something like that

You must be joking.

[YellowCrystarium]

This is a family friendly game, so I doubt they'd ever release something like that

But there's a bust slider. You can't use that logic in this game. Bye.

[BunniEclair]

But there's a bust slider. You can't use that logic in this game. Bye.

My viera bust is big enough for the whole family to rest their weary heads on, and therefore extremely family friendly. Can you say the same for your bulge? Checkmate.

[ElciaDeiLinus]

But there's a bust slider. You can't use that logic in this game. Bye.

I can tell what people's busts are sized just walking around in a family friendly place like a mall, same with butts. A slider for those makes as much as sense as a height or other proportion slider.

Can't say the same for people's junk.

[Nicodemus_Mercy]

A "junk" slider isn't really necessary. However... the basic male model should not be as flat as a ken doll. It's a biological fact that males have something there. There's nothing "family unfriendly" in having the male character model reflect that biological truth. It doesn't have to be gratuitously large, but there should be "something" there as opposed to the "nothing" we currently have.

If even the slightest three dimensional hint of male genitalia is not "family friendly" then why doesn't the civilized world require men to "tuck" when they go out in public? The answer is simple... because that would be ridiculous. And it's just as ridiculous to create a game character model, that is supposed to be representative of a male, that has a groin area as flat as a board.

[RyuSaarva]

A "junk" slider isn't really necessary. However... the basic male model should not be as flat as a ken doll. It's a biological fact that males have something there. There's nothing "family unfriendly" in having the male character model reflect that biological truth. It doesn't have to be gratuitously large, but there should be "something" there as opposed to the "nothing" we currently have.

If even the slightest three dimensional hint of male genitalia is not "family friendly" then why doesn't the civilized world require men to "tuck" when they go out in public? The answer is simple... because that would be ridiculous. And it's just as ridiculous to create a game character model, that is supposed to be representative of a male, that has a groin area as flat as a board.

sorry but the male model looks perfectly normal to me, maybe you just like to hangout in places where people have erect genitalia all the time.

[Vahlnir]

sorry but the male model looks perfectly normal to me, maybe you just like to hangout in places where people have erect genitalia all the time.

Personally, I'm never looking at my character's crotch (or any character's for that matter) but even I know that male characters are essentially Ken dolls. It isn't something that bothers me but I'm not oblivious to it either.

[Fredco191]

Or... They could just change the models to add something there.

[Nicodemus_Mercy]

sorry but the male model looks perfectly normal to me, maybe you just like to hangout in places where people have erect genitalia all the time.

I'm not sure how you can say that in any kind of honest way.

You can't tell me, when looking at a male in this game, that there isn't a distinct LACK of "something" there:



The groin area should not be that flat on a male character. Even a flaccid male is not that flat. About the only males that flat are drag queens after tucking.