It's time (Option to Hide other players Glamour)

[SoloWingMetatron]

Snip and dip

True. I have not read the whole thread. Only about half a dozen pages worth. But ain't no body got time for reading through a couple hundred pages, to find the point in this none issue. Exactly, side tracks. Which is what this has all become since I jumped into the frey (big mistake with these forums) and was my soul purpose in my replies with some added hashtags for the giggle.

Oh is it educational?...did your education teach you not to be so incredibly condescending?...see we can all do it. And your boy Theo be talking about attacks?...Where you at Theo?

Your final point is exactly it. The real T and one I can get behind. I shall happily discuss things as they are. But once it becomes about trying to "win" and/or about bizarre sidetracks. Then what is even anymore?

Seriously carby slippers and frog suits be odd and not too my taste. But some peeps like that and to truly tolerate something is not to hide yourself from it. But to allow it to exist around you without you reacting.

[Lauront]

Seriously carby slippers and frog suits be odd and not too my taste. But some peeps like that and to truly tolerate something is not to hide yourself from it. But to allow it to exist around you without you reacting.

It's allowed to exist. What you're equating tolerance to is disabling any negative reaction to something - one can both tolerate it, i.e. allow it to exist, and also want little to do with it. I can both allow it to exist and employ a feature to hide it from my sight. Whilst I don't consider the feature imperative, it would be a nice to have.

[Krotoan]

True. I have not read the whole thread. Only about half a dozen pages worth. But ain't no body got time for reading through a couple hundred pages, to find the point in this none issue. Exactly, side tracks. Which is what this has all become since I jumped into the frey (big mistake with these forums) and was my soul purpose in my replies with some added hashtags for the giggle.

Oh is it educational?...did your education teach you not to be so incredibly condescending?...see we can all do it. And your boy Theo be talking about attacks?...Where you at Theo?

The term you're trying to use is "non-issue", and considering there is this much discussion about it, that can't possibly be the case. I'm going to guess maybe English isn't your first language, which is fine of course but I will say that your assumption I'm being intentionally condescending is incorrect. This is just how I talk. If you want to make claims as you have you really SHOULD read more of the thread and it is very educational, no sarcasm intended. And Theo is not my "boy". I believe there are other threads where we were pretty at odds if you want to check out our particular post histories.

Your final point is exactly it. The real T and one I can get behind. I shall happily discuss things as they are. But once it becomes about trying to "win" and/or about bizarre sidetracks. Then what is even anymore?

When I reply to people arguing morals I have to discuss morals and how they relate. I'm not about to let people steer the conversation away without calling them out on it. I think only a few pages back there was an actual discussion about implementation before we got someone literally making an argument that earlier someone had said nobody would make : "everyone who supports this is a bigot".

Seriously carby slippers and frog suits be odd and not too my taste. But some peeps like that and to truly tolerate something is not to hide yourself from it. But to allow it to exist around you without you reacting.

I tolerate it fine and do not react in the slightest. If someone mentions something that could enhance my enjoyment of the game though, I'll speak up to support it. If you are however asking me to change my actual likes and dislikes.. then who's being intolerant?

[SoloWingMetatron]

The term you're trying to use is "non-issue", and considering there is this much discussion about it, that can't possibly be the case. I'm going to guess maybe English isn't your first language, which is fine of course but I will say that your assumption I'm being intentionally condescending is incorrect. This is just how I talk. If you want to make claims as you have you really SHOULD read more of the thread and it is very educational, no sarcasm intended. And Theo is not my "boy". I believe there are other threads where we were pretty at odds if you want to check out our particular post histories.

Ah so your still going for the extreme condescending approach? Not to fight fire with fire, but It's pretty clear I know Theo ain't your boy and that it is a comment on the fact he jumped to your defense despite you throwing plenty "attacks" yourself. But of course if you werent trying to "win" here you would have acknowledged that part of my post and your attitude.

What was that about rule breaking? Yep I'm the only guilty party here. Sure let's go with that.

Again your final point is exactly it and one I agree with. See how if you just went with that and cut out all the garbage above we'd be happy campers.