Customization beyond character creation and choice of class, lateral progression, substantial coordination, performance metrics, actually healing, and transparency.
Customization beyond character creation and choice of class, lateral progression, substantial coordination, performance metrics, actually healing, and transparency.





Agree with all those. The healing model in this game, where you're required to dps, but then stuck with really simplistic, dull healing "rotations" baffles me. At the least they could make them a bit more like dps rotations, particularly for WHM, because I can't imagine 1 nuke 1 dot is much fun.I might even be fine with just having some slightly less clear-cut shared-CD actions and more significant stat effects that are more conveniently set (e.g. being able to choose between two secondary stat choices per gear piece, and choosing breakpoints to keep to between them).
Some jobs have good deal of difference in playflow available to them just by switching between GCD speeds.
In general I'm wary of choices for the sake of choices, but having several playflow variants or a few other significant changes per job can be worth their development costs insofar as they increase the breadth of attraction of jobs that might otherwise be overlooked.
Anything that increases the product of breadth and depth of attraction to players more than it increases the development costs necessary, without decreasing overall cohesion, will likely be good design.
I think specs would be very hard to implement given their job model, but the sort of individuation you mention would be a welcome addition.
I'll add to those, the greater focus on races that some MMOs have, like racial starting/home zones/cultures and the like. I'm not too fond of this game's preference for trying to put that focus in the cities and it can lead to certain races' lore being shoved into the background and things feeling a bit same-y. They've improved on it since 2.0 but the damage has been done.
Another would be classes (="jobs") focused on the "fight fire with fire" mindset, like WoW's Warlock, Demon Hunter, Shadow Priest or Death Knight, on the shadier/more morally grey side of the spectrum... this game has little like that. It's partly due to the lore on aether, but also because of the character's role in the story. Even BLM and DRK are rather tame in this regard - the closest would be something like Void Mage or Necromancer. I'm hoping with the end of the Hydaelyn/Zodiark saga they'll begin taking a few more liberties, but I somehow doubt that they will.
Last edited by Lauront; 02-26-2020 at 05:58 AM.
I doubt what I've suggested alone would be enough to deal with what you've mentioned, but it could do a fair bit of good for those who want deeper kits after the core experience has already been made as button-efficient (depth per button) as possible, with a much higher depth floor for the jobs currently with the simplest playflow. But, doubtless a large portion of players would not want that. Some still seem defensive about the slightest enhancements to depth of their favorite jobs (most noticeably in SCH, WHM, SMN, RDM, BLM, DNC, MCH, and BRD). Yet, without some increase there would be far too little for any individuation to make use of. We'd be left with only the same customization we already have: Spell Speed GCD tiers on BLM and maybe WHM and Skill Speed GCD tiers on MNK, DRG, and SAM, while everyone else has one tier to play at, even if that obligatory GCD is less than the base. At best, we'd have shuffled around how stats work to make it easier to stick to a particular GCD tier while regearing, which is... good, marginally, for some, but a waste for most.Agree with all those. The healing model in this game, where you're required to dps, but then stuck with really simplistic, dull healing "rotations" baffles me. At the least they could make them a bit more like dps rotations, particularly for WHM, because I can't imagine 1 nuke 1 dot is much fun.
I think specs would be very hard to implement given their job model, but the sort of individuation you mention would be a welcome addition.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.
Reply With Quote


