Quote Originally Posted by Iscah View Post
I've wondered before about how those scenes work, and I don't think it's a "filter" - possibly any more than glamour plates were the temporary overlays that people originally envisaged they would be.

In those instances, you're specifically warned that your character is going to appear "glamoured" into certain gear but it won't affect your stats.

What I suspect it might be doing behind the scenes is making a copy of your character (or their gear) and applying glamours to it for the instance.

Regardless of how they do it, it has only been done in solo instances where only your character is affected. The costumes shown have been modest so it's not a case of being forced into revealing gear, as multiple people have mentioned being a concern about a wider filter system.





I fail to see how either blocking or not-blocking glamours (I don't know which you are arguing for) will guarantee that you are the only person in the room wearing pink.
I don't care seriously if I'm the only one in pink. Since you couldn't bother to read my other posts, I'm for a filter for ppl to block other ppl's glamour. The arguments previously were immersion in the game, individuality, freedom of expression to which I've commented/ replied to, you missed.
Immersion is solely dependent on the individual player. To that end why, would it matter to others what another individual chose their immersion in the game to be? In my game most players are just filler making my Eorzea look full.
Individuality, well it's not individuality if there are tons of other players that look the same.
Freedom of expression. Fine. Continue to glamour away because I will.
It would not affect sales of glamour one way or another because the players that live by "Glamour is true end game" are the ones that glamour is important to and we will continue.
The claim that is would be a wasted resource, I point out the capability is there to block glamour. The fact it's a solo instance that I used for my example doesn't matter.