now before 5.2 a small bump to keep this little bastion up, have fun with the patch gentlement.



now before 5.2 a small bump to keep this little bastion up, have fun with the patch gentlement.


Patch 5.2 job changes... smh



As expected not that drk got nothing that it's just minor changes for new tier
Odd number patches are rework patches


I feel a 4.2 war buff scenario coming on... buffing a part of the job no one was asking for may be the precursor to a larger rework to ungodly op status in 5.3.
Conspiracy theory aside if se is not going to make the meaningful changes asked for it would be nice for them to have the courtesy to comment and tell ‘em to pound sand with a reason. I feel the exact same way about DRK. The radio silence on valid QoL things is frustrating to say the least.
Doubt it. Unless both DRK and WAR get reworks at the same time. The outcry of DRKs is probably offset by the fact it has one of the highest play numbers of the tanks.I feel a 4.2 war buff scenario coming on... buffing a part of the job no one was asking for may be the precursor to a larger rework to ungodly op status in 5.3.
Conspiracy theory aside if se is not going to make the meaningful changes asked for it would be nice for them to have the courtesy to comment and tell ‘em to pound sand with a reason. I feel the exact same way about DRK. The radio silence on valid QoL things is frustrating to say the least.


It’s all in jest. No one is getting a rework at this point. Everything was balanced prior to the expansion and I hope se learned their lesson with boosting WAR to op status in 4.2. I just want DRKs bw to work like all the other 10 second abilities. It’s a 1 gcd rip-off currently.
I don't think it was an issue of SE blatantly buffing WAR to OP in 4.2. It was actually quite irratic from 4.0-4.2 being complete garbage and then being... meh, better than DRK. Its damage was inconsistant was given a useless skill in shake it off (before they finally decided to rework it was just a cleanse). It was what they thought was "oooh if we make it static damage by removing the RNG of it that will work!).It’s all in jest. No one is getting a rework at this point. Everything was balanced prior to the expansion and I hope se learned their lesson with boosting WAR to op status in 4.2. I just want DRKs bw to work like all the other 10 second abilities. It’s a 1 gcd rip-off currently.
To that I say...
Oh SE... you look at DRK recently? Its balanced in damage according to you and is a bit of a fell cleave bot in Bloodspiller, yet you figured out how to 'balance' it without needing DH/Crit.


Don’t curse DRK with another expansion of current delirium. Take the dhcrits away from war and rebalance but give DRK something original like they should have had from the beginning of this expansion.I don't think it was an issue of SE blatantly buffing WAR to OP in 4.2. It was actually quite irratic from 4.0-4.2 being complete garbage and then being... meh, better than DRK. Its damage was inconsistant was given a useless skill in shake it off (before they finally decided to rework it was just a cleanse). It was what they thought was "oooh if we make it static damage by removing the RNG of it that will work!).
To that I say...
Oh SE... you look at DRK recently? Its balanced in damage according to you and is a bit of a fell cleave bot in Bloodspiller, yet you figured out how to 'balance' it without needing DH/Crit.

SE be like:![]()
Not surprised DRK got nothing woulda liked something at least a QoL change but poor WAR was teased to have changes to basically get nothing.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.
Reply With Quote




