It's time (Option to Hide other players Glamour)

[Iscah]

A character such as Thancred is designed in a way that is objectively far less jarring than a character clad in a frog or pig suit.

Yes, but then we have people in this very thread bringing up "healers wearing the sky pirate tank coat" as an example of immersion-breaking glamour. That coat would fit right in with the NPC character designs.

[Iscah]

For the record, novelty animal outfits are on the long list of things I wouldn't want to be put into.

[SonKevin]

It's amazing how self absorbed people are that they want SE to bother making an option all for you because you don't like looking at other players, while wanting to be left alone apparently makes me the narcissist.

But you are left alone. That's why it's amazing how insane people are. This option will not affect your game or gameplay in any way. Unless you enjoy flaunting your appearance to others in which case you're not doing it because you enjoy it, but because you want attention.

[Lauront]

*snip*

That's the impression I'm getting too. I really fail to see what the trouble with adding such an option is, other than how feasible or cost-efficient it is.

[Arngrim_Greyashe]

I fail to understand why there's an argument still going about a hypothetical feature that isn't even being considered by SE at this point.

To the people actually insulting others, really? That's mature.

[Zabuza]

I fail to understand why there's an argument still going about a hypothetical feature that isn't even being considered by SE at this point.

To the people actually insulting others, really? That's mature.

It is the principle of the matter. I was fine staying out of the discussion until people started getting offended about advocates of the feature possibly having the benign option to have a toggle on the glamour. To me, it was a direct attack on choice which is something that does not sit well with me.

[3c-33]

You've yet to produce a compelling argument for why something like this shouldn't exist. All I've seen is that you believe that it would somehow remove your ability to glamour how you want, despite being told time and again that wouldn't be the case. If you were actually adamant about your stance, if you truly believe what you you're saying is correct, then it shouldn't matter how many times you have to say it. Just going "I don't care" after being refuted shows that you don't have any conviction and don't believe your own arguments.

You didn't "refute" anything.

Me participating in this for 20 pages means I have no conviction and don't believe what I'm saying? Okay.

You're right, it shouldn't have to matter how many times I have to say it, in fact I could say it zero times and never post here and what I think wouldn't change.

[Dakuryon]

Literally this entire thread be like:



I mean, can't we all just come to a fair compromise or something? It's just glam. It shouldn't be that big of a deal, loves. Me personally, if this feature was to ever happen I'd be okay with it since it wouldn't affect me and both parties would be happy. We'd do our thing, nobody would know if our outfits was set to default for each other and stuff. We're all here to have a good time and look amazing while doing it, after all ^-^

[Zabuza]

Literally this entire thread be like:



I mean, can't we all just come to a fair compromise or something? It's just glam. It shouldn't be that big of a deal, loves. Me personally, if this feature was to ever happen I'd be okay with it since it wouldn't affect me and both parties would be happy.

I mean, judging from the forums, glam seems to be the #1 topic of discussion so...obviously the forum considers glam to be a big deal. Just look at all the topics that have hundreds of pages. Nearly all of them are glam related.

[SonKevin]

I mean, judging from the forums, glam seems to be the #1 topic of discussion so...obviously the forum considers glam to be a big deal. Just look at all the topics that have hundreds of pages. Nearly all of them are glam related.

That's because glamour is the real end game.