
Originally Posted by
Lucy_Pyre
Case not closed. Like I said before, at its maximum potential Nascent is more powerful than TBN, this is true. However, the factor that makes TBN overall stronger than Nascent is when you factor in TBN's potential uptime and then compare it to how often Warrior is able to heal 37k+ HP from NF (as 37k is the amount of shielding TBN grants on a BiS tank). Since NF heals for 50% of damage dealt during, in order to heal 37k+ HP you need to deal a minimum of 74k damage during the 6 second window. This simply isn't possible if all you have available for NF is your basic 1-2-3 weaponskills at the given time during which you need to use it. You need at a minimum to use a Fell Cleave + Upheaval (not during IR) or an Inner Chaos charge in order to have NF's healing be comparable to the eHP that TBN's shielding gives you, and as Upheaval is on a strict 30 second CD which you keep rolling at all times, and Infuriate charges are primarily held for burst windows with raid buffs, this is often simply not possible to do. In other words; yes, if you need to use NF during IR or at a point where you can blow two Infuriate's on it, its healing is significantly more powerful than that of which TBN's shielding can offer (the rough maximum I have healed from dummy testing was around 75k HP healed from 2x IC, 1x IR FC, 1x IR Upheaval, and two auto attacks). However, over the entire course of a fight TBN will total out to a greater amount of eHP due to its uptime and its consistent level of mitigation, whereas NF's mitigation value and eHP fluctuates based upon your damage output at any given moment.