and? You would still be right, you would go STR/DEX for a DD classI don't really want to get into detail as to why I do the same damage, and take hardly no notable extra damage on mobs of level 50 at Lv. 50 with gear off or on. Though I do have a question.
regarding patch 1.20 there was information given,
Strength
- attack power
- damage dealt by puglist, gladiator, marauder, and lancer arms
Vitality
- damage taken
- enhancement magic potency
- maximum HP
- damage dealt by marauder arms
Dexterity
- Accuracy
- Block Rate
- Parry
- Damage dealt by archer arms
Intelligence
- Attack magic potency
- Damage dealt by puglist arms
Mind
- Healing magic potency
- magic Accuracy
- Damage dealt by gladiator, thaumaturge, and conjurer arms.
Piety
- magic evasion
- enfeebing magic potency
- Max MP
- Damage dealt by archer, lancer, thaumaturge, and conjurer arms.
in-game; under point allotment. If you scroll over the stats, it gives you a description of what each stat does. Where in the world did the Defs in the patch notes get "Damage dealt by archer, lancer, thm, con." tied in with Piety for example. It makes perfect sense to be STR & DEX.
If I was a new player, playing a DAMAGE CLASS, and someone who doesn't read patch notes for example, I would very well read the description, the game gives under point allotment, and go with STR & DEX.
which is wrong. the game or the patch notes? (all the stats not just piety)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.