How ironic of you to tell someone they don't understand the problem because they don't agree with you, when Square Enix disagrees on your vision of what an FC should be.I don't think you understand the scope of the issue at hand. Otherwise I think you might agree with me.
Instancing FC housing is so that every FC can have a house, without a member count requirement. The member count requirement comes from earning actual profit from the FC itself. My proposal benefits most real FC's, and only serves as a detriment to single player FC's. What often seems to be the case is that those single player FC's stand to gain much more as an individual player because of it, and that needs to be balanced. If they have to grow in order to profit, or if they have to join another FC, the point of FC's isn't to play alone.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.