
Originally Posted by
ShadowMeowth
Uhuhuhuh ~
I agree that there is some sympathy towards Vauthry that is rather glossed over: he is Innocence because he truly believes himself innocent, since he has been told the moment he was born that he was a god-like being that could not be wrong. Vauthry is pretty much a construct, and the responsibility lies in his father's choice and education. Emet's suggestion sounds wicked and cruel but in his eyes he probably thought that while ensuring Light's hold onto the First he would also give the people some reprieve from the sin eaters; after the Lakeland duty, Emet laments that he did not imagine Vauthry capable of unleashing his army for anything, so I would say he merely left the decision to Vauthry's father. He does mention that most of the times all he does is sowing the seeds of chaos and it is man who tends them, and this is an example.
All the discussion about those who got away after doing heinous deeds makes me think of the sin eaters and the whole "forgiveness" theme. Sin eaters kill, and you transform into a "Forgiven Whatever" and that is it. What is the purpose, then? The theme is brought up again with Cylva's sidequest and how she pleads to be killed for her sins, and you refuse arguing that the living have no use for her death. This is actually something that I have said many times: I loathe the Redemption Equals Death trope. What I would like to see is keeping the memories and still forging a new life. Aye, I am eyeing Hades here, I regret nothing. I am convinced he is not yet off the picture.
It's the final countdown!
Emet-Selch wasn't interested in granting a reprieve to anyone, though? The Ascians had to slow the tilt of Light on the First, it was going too fast. Vauthry was created as a stopgap to prevent that, not to do anyone any favors. Emet-Selch's suggestion sounded wicked and cruel because it was? There is no positive way to spin what he did there. :s He talked over a frightened woman about using her as a vessel to corrupt her unborn baby so his father could rule the world. And when her HUSBAND consented, he did it to her, regardless of her obvious fear. ("Left the decision to Vauthry's father"? How about his mother, lmao, she's people too, and it's sort of her body) That is skeevy for both Emet-Selch AND the former mayor. (Not to mention the whole bit that he doesn't see any of us as "really alive".)
It seems disingenous of Emet-Selch to "sow the seeds of chaos" and then blame humanity for the result in general, particularly in Vauthry's case. Emet-Selch stacked that deck. Sin Eaters corrupt. Take Titania for instance, the Lightwarden changed them into a twisted mockery of the benevolent ruler they were said to be. Tesleen was caring and selfless but once corrupted, she was unable to be anything other than a monster. Vauthry would be no exception. He never had a chance to act of his own free will. Everything he did was through the lens of a Lightwarden, apparently the strongest one, that was changing him from birth. (The "half Sin Eater" bit seemed a lie on his father's part, you can't be half anything when you were already a whole Hume infant in the womb. Even Y'shtola remarked the Warden "took control" of Vauthry, implying they were two separate entities.) I would argue he was "Innocence" because the real him, the one free of the Lightwarden, never had a chance to do anything in life. He was a prisoner from birth.
I'd be all for Vauthry keeping memories and living to have his own life. He and his mother were casualties of the Ascians' shenanigans. They would deserve that. But since that is not possible, I'd settle for just being able once to say "hey, guys, this isn't how it was at all". As it stands, there IS no sympathy for what happened there, for him. We let the lie perpetuate that he was evil by choice, and not like every other character corrupted by a Sin Eater, trapped in a body he no longer truly controlled.