Can we please just have instanced housing already?

[TheForce]

You can't use any outdoor furnishing in an apartment. You can't crossbreed either.

It's also amazing how people use some outliers to demonize a sector of the player base with valid complaints.

I mean, there has to be some incentive to own an estate. You can't have something cost literally sextuple the price of an apartment and have be the exact same thing. And like I said in my first reply, it is very important to remember that estates are luxuries.

[Driavna]

I mean, there has to be some incentive to own an estate. You can't have something cost literally sextuple the price of an apartment and have be the exact same thing. And like I said in my first reply, it is very important to remember that estates are luxuries.

The price of a house varies according to the size of the plot, you can do something similar to apartments. Anyway, improving apartments is not going to take anything away from current states, unless, the whole value of an estate is to be rare so owners can feel special for having one.

[hasana]

unless, the whole value of an estate is to be rare so owners can feel special for having one.

It is part of housing yes.

[Lycieus]

It is part of housing yes.

So you want other people to not have housing so you can have a sense of validation?

[Lycieus]

I mean, there has to be some incentive to own an estate. You can't have something cost literally sextuple the price of an apartment and have be the exact same thing. And like I said in my first reply, it is very important to remember that estates are luxuries.

Why though? In neither of your posts did you really offer a reason as to why things should be as they are. Why should they be a luxury item? Square has aggressively marketed housing and its various features since their inception, and they continue to dump resources into it even though most of the player base doesn't have access to say a yard or gardening plots.