Considering the number of calamities the world has gone through which even drove the Sahagin from the deeps to have to nest at an island I think its safe to say that the Archaeotania died in one of the calamities.Then again, if Archaeotania pre-dates the Sundering, I wonder why it seems to have survived twelve thousand years on the First, but the Source doesn't seem to have one, and possibly only survives as a Primal myth. Does it count as a "fragmented" existence? Does the existence of Midgardsormr's brood on the Source have anything to do with Archaeotania's absence?


Yeah, I think there was discussion in various places about how convenient the Calamities are with regards to Source vs Shard differences. Twelve thousand years is nothing geologically speaking, so any similarities can be explained as that, but the Calamities were (possibly deliberately) unspecified in their scope, so any differences in geography could also be explained by those. Especially with the "shattering continents" of the Fourth Calamity (ie the Crystal Tower one), which implies some sort of change in landmass.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote

