Results 1 to 10 of 20

Thread: Armoire

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    AnimaAnimus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    1,344
    Character
    Cynric Zerr
    World
    Sargatanas
    Main Class
    Red Mage Lv 70
    Avoid changing jobs in the field? What? The whole reason I don't use plates is so i CAN change jobs in the field and maintain my glam. I use glamour that suits all jobs that piece can wear and change it where ever I want. /easypeasy

    You also don't need to carry prism gear with you, I apply it then put it right back on my retainers, in the armoire, glam chest or w/e I keep it. idk why ppl have this misconception you need to have that piece on you at all times if you glamour it. Heck I even have sold/traded glamour items in for gc seals, completely removing it from my inventory and the glamour stays as long as I don't glamour over it. Plus prisms are cheap (esp being a crafter) and only take up 1 slot, its not like you have 20 prisms anymore.

    The only real difference between the 2 systems is you can keep everything in your glamour dresser, which if you have any sort of inventory management in place anyway really makes no difference, because finding things isn't that difficult unless you are a super disorganized person. And you cant change glamour in the field. Plus if I want to apply a new glamour to a piece. I don't have to go back to a major city and go into an inn room to do it. I get a piece, I glam it, then store it. Done. I simply right click, apply glam, anywhere.

    I really don't know why a suggestion to actually improve the system and make it more functional, which would be beneficial to everyone is met with such criticism. I mean come on, this is a new level of absurd white knighting. If you like having to go back to a city, every single time you change jobs just so you get that glam you want and think the system is one of perfection, cool, you do you. But to me, its a waste of time and a poor design that needs an update. You aren't going to change my mind with this nonsensical rambling of why I am so wrong.

    Like I said, if you spend your time sitting around in cities or your house doing whatever, then it makes no difference, but those of us out there actively playing in the game world, this doesn't work so well.
    (0)
    Last edited by AnimaAnimus; 08-06-2019 at 04:49 AM.

  2. #2
    Player
    Iscah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    14,100
    Character
    Aurelie Moonsong
    World
    Bismarck
    Main Class
    Summoner Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by AnimaAnimus View Post
    You also don't need to carry prism gear with you, I apply it then put it right back on my retainers, in the armoire, glam chest or w/e I keep it.

    ...

    If you like having to go back to a city, every single time you change jobs just so you get that glam you want and think the system is one of perfection, cool, you do you. But to me, its a waste of time and a poor design that needs an update. You aren't going to change my mind with this nonsensical rambling of why I am so wrong.
    Having to go back to a city every time... like you would have to do to retrieve items from your retainers?

    I didn't say the system is perfect. It could be improved by making it function outside of cities. But it does some things very well and it makes glamouring far easier than the old system. I'm not white-knighting, I genuinely find it useful for what it currently does - regardless of what additional features could be added to make it better. As soon as I started playing around with it, I was impressed by how much easier it was to keep a consistent appearance for my character while leveling and upgrading gear.

    The lack of switching classes doesn't bother me because that's not what I'm using it for. (If it could do so, that might change. But again, we're still in the same situation as if only prisms were available.) I usually raise one or two classes at a time, and if they share gear then I stagger the levels so they don't need it at the same time, or plan an outfit that works for both. That shared outfit is still easier to apply from a plate.

    My glamour plates currently have four different outfits for my summoner, three for healers, and the rest are single costumes for classes I'm leveling.

    Because I have those costumes all ready to go, I can decide I feel like running a dungeon in my pretty relic gear instead of my usual simpler outfit, switch to it, switch back afterwards. Or change it just to watch a cutscene and see my character wearing that particular outfit.

    It means I can glamour jewellery appropriate to each outfit (or invisible), something I wouldn't have bothered with every time I upgraded gear with prisms.

    I'm not saying the system is perfect. I'm saying that is has a good use, even if it isn't the one people expected, and saying "it's useless because it doesn't do X" misses the fact that it does Y very well.
    (0)
    Last edited by Iscah; 08-06-2019 at 05:22 AM.

  3. #3
    Player
    Astrus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    409
    Character
    Karma Dunkelsonn
    World
    Shiva
    Main Class
    Warrior Lv 91
    Quote Originally Posted by AnimaAnimus View Post
    Avoid changing jobs in the field? What? The whole reason I don't use plates is so i CAN change jobs in the field and maintain my glam. I use glamour that suits all jobs that piece can wear and change it where ever I want. /easypeasy
    Excuse me for asking the obvious but are you aware that glamours applied through a plate stay on the gear until you remove or overwrite the glamour just as if you used prisms to manually glamour?
    The only real limitation are shared sets but as long as you're using different gear pieces for all your jobs switching in the field retains the glamour just fine.
    Considering you don't need to keep the items in the armoire/dresser once you've added them to a plate you can use plates for automated/bulk glamouring for free while in a city hub and still carry the pieces and prisms with you if you have to re-glam an upgrade you got in the field if you wanted.
    (1)