Avoid changing jobs in the field? What? The whole reason I don't use plates is so i CAN change jobs in the field and maintain my glam. I use glamour that suits all jobs that piece can wear and change it where ever I want. /easypeasy
You also don't need to carry prism gear with you, I apply it then put it right back on my retainers, in the armoire, glam chest or w/e I keep it. idk why ppl have this misconception you need to have that piece on you at all times if you glamour it. Heck I even have sold/traded glamour items in for gc seals, completely removing it from my inventory and the glamour stays as long as I don't glamour over it. Plus prisms are cheap (esp being a crafter) and only take up 1 slot, its not like you have 20 prisms anymore.
The only real difference between the 2 systems is you can keep everything in your glamour dresser, which if you have any sort of inventory management in place anyway really makes no difference, because finding things isn't that difficult unless you are a super disorganized person. And you cant change glamour in the field. Plus if I want to apply a new glamour to a piece. I don't have to go back to a major city and go into an inn room to do it. I get a piece, I glam it, then store it. Done. I simply right click, apply glam, anywhere.
I really don't know why a suggestion to actually improve the system and make it more functional, which would be beneficial to everyone is met with such criticism. I mean come on, this is a new level of absurd white knighting. If you like having to go back to a city, every single time you change jobs just so you get that glam you want and think the system is one of perfection, cool, you do you. But to me, its a waste of time and a poor design that needs an update. You aren't going to change my mind with this nonsensical rambling of why I am so wrong.
Like I said, if you spend your time sitting around in cities or your house doing whatever, then it makes no difference, but those of us out there actively playing in the game world, this doesn't work so well.


Reply With Quote




