Lore question about G'raha Tia (Shb spoiler)

[Fynlar]

I know it's obvious and all, but still it's easy enough to use "Exarch" in the title and it wouldn't even be debatably a kinda sorta spoiler.

But then people would know that the SB2 story features a character called the Crystal Exarch. They'd know his name and everything. Obviously a spoiler, if we're to follow the same sort of logic (which I personally don't)

[Iscah]

But then people would know that the SB2 story features a character called the Crystal Exarch. They'd know his name and everything. Obviously a spoiler, if we're to follow the same sort of logic (which I personally don't)

But it doesn't connect back to anything. You'll know there's someone in the story called "the Exarch", which is meaningless until you meet him in that story. Whereas G'raha Tia is a pre-established character from a previous storyline.

Regardless of whether the thread title is appropriate or not, knowing that "the Exarch" is a character in Shadowbringers does not equate to knowing that G'raha Tia will be returning to the story in Shadowbringers.

By comparison in the past,

Lyse's name and face is all over promotion for Stormblood, and I never connected her to Yda.