Ten entire characters.

Part 2
-snipped bit where you challenge my stance on the inaccuracy of women being inherently better caregivers than men-
I understand if that's how you feel, but data suggests otherwise. In fact, I would posit that the success of child-rearing depends wholly on the stability of the household and not the sex or sexual orientation of the parents. Here are a few of the scholarly articles supporting my claim:

https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentra...71-2458-14-635
http://people.virginia.edu/~cjp/articles/ffp10b.pdf
https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1995-17268-001

Call it a cross-reference. The general consensus is that children of same-sex parents (gay/lesbian) fared no better than children of opposite-sex parents, so that immediately challenges your contention.

I would argue that this is only to be expected, as human biology defies homosexuality
Bolded the literally logically incoherent thing you just said. If homosexuality is biologically present in humans, it is, by definition, biological. It doesn't defy biology, it is quite literally biological. I'm also going to tap you for citing an article from a site with a very heavy, very well-known right-wing bias. There is a reason why I'm making an appeal to raw data and not HuffingtonPost or Daily Kos or some other such nonsense.