

Would saying that Zenos would be underwritten be more objective?My issue with the "Edax Test" is that it's not really a test - it's an assertion, and that can be challenged.
"Zenos killing the Warrior of Light doesn't advance the plot, therefore he is poorly written."
-Not necessarily...
What constitutes "good writing" and "bad writing" are somewhat subjective, so trying to apply an objective criteria to determine those is bound to fail.


I suppose it depends on what a given person would feel is "sufficiently written".
Subjectively for me, Zenos falls under the category of either being under-written, or sufficiently written, but there's simply not much there. Which almost directly leads into the criticism that if he feels this under-written after an entire expansion about him (not counting whatever is in store in future patches), then there might be a problem with narrative pacing.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote

