Results 1 to 10 of 16

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Kazrah's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    1,464
    Character
    Nonni Brilante
    World
    Moogle
    Main Class
    Paladin Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by MaybeOliverB View Post
    From SE's perspective, more gil gets taken out of the game so why would they care? There are servers in this game where housing can be purchased on sight. If someone's harming themselves when they have better options, that's on them really.
    They'd care because no amount of gil lost on a server can pay off all the bad press they've been getting about the housing issue along with unhappy players, both of which result in potentially lost revenue.

    Then again, if you're causing the problem, you clearly wouldn't understand how much damage abusing a system can do to a game.
    (4)

  2. #2
    Player
    MaybeOliverB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    161
    Character
    M'naago Cat
    World
    Gilgamesh
    Main Class
    Dragoon Lv 70
    Quote Originally Posted by Kazrah View Post
    They'd care because no amount of gil lost on a server can pay off all the bad press they've been getting about the housing issue along with unhappy players, both of which result in potentially lost revenue.

    Then again, if you're causing the problem, you clearly wouldn't understand how much damage abusing a system can do to a game.
    Bad press about housing? Game outlets are praising this game at the moment, especially with the release of ShadowBringers. They just announced how they went beyond 1m active players. Obviously they are worrying about a minority of players on the NA servers, who instead of unsubscribing, spend their free time clicking on a placard or use automation . There's no lost revenue over this. If anything, the current system keeps player subscribed just to reset housing timers, which is an issue on it's own.

    I very much understand housing, just look at the signature. I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy and delusion that is plaguing this forum. Before complaining about the visible minority of multi-house owners, it might be wiser to talk about the thousands of players who take advantage of the very generous demolition timer or those who willingly let their house get demolished when they could obviously relinquish right away instead of letting their house in limbo for 45 days. Then there's personal house owners who don't have the maximum amount of tenants that is permitted as those players are effectively preventing any houseless rank 6 FC from having a house.
    (0)