WHM DPS needs to stay this high.

[Alphras]

If you double my projected value chain strategem's contribution, which I think that we can agree would be a gross over representation of its contribution, whm is still far ahead. Further, I used numbers of what a high end group would pull. I'd argue that 469 dps is already an over representation of chain stratagem's contribution in the majority of scenarios.

I agree for most groups the contribution is way less. I'd argue, however, that has already been the case in 4.x. I am pretty sure most groups would have profited more from WHM than from SCH, but that's not what the all important meta dictated.

That point is of course reinforced this addon

[Lagomorph]

I agree for most groups the contribution is way less. I'd argue, however, that has already been the case in 4.x. I am pretty sure most groups would have profited more from WHM than from SCH, but that's not what the all important meta dictated.

That point is of course reinforced this addon

100% agree on your point about what the meta dictates. This is why I think the way to balance whm is not personal dps. It's to give them some utility too.