Quote Originally Posted by Evraeh View Post
Well for Zordiark
I don't feel him so evil as Hydealyn is telling us. Hydealyn said we have to "stop/destroy" ascians (without mercy I guess?), but she never talk about that desaster or maybe she didn't know ? She keeps so much secrets... From what we know, she was summoned to stop Zodiark mighty power (to stop sacrifices). In a strong battle, she wins. Then she protect us/her children, I guess it's normal for a mother. But is that really fair about Zodiark ?

Zodiark saved the planet, it's sure. But after the apocalypse there was not so much left. He needed power to restore a lot - so still need sacrifices. I can understand both camps. One want to save the lost lifes ( who could be trapped in Zodiark ?) and other want to save the current life (sacrificed still to create Hydealyn). It's truly a vicious circle.
I feel Hydaelyn was created to save the "future" without think about the past. But from that point, if Zodiark was created to "save the planet". Do his resurection will mean the end of our world ? Do he is just evil and want to kill everyone ? Or they don't like each other (Zodiark and Hydealyn)?

That is why, I would like to talk directly to Zodiark, cause we have only one version.
Regarding Zordiark

I'm absolutely not against having Zodiark point of view to compare it with Hydaelyn one.
And it's clearly possible that Zodiark is more neutral than evil, and just doing the job he is asked for.

But in fact, we don't have to chose Hydaelyn or Zodiark, what we have to choose is between the choice of the Amaurot Coucil and of the ones who opposed it (that i think are "more or less" still the same then and now with us as their unofficial leader both time). In that matter, my choice is done.
This choice could even conclude that we must end both Hydaelyn and Zodiark.