




I wonder if it will include msq trials. Part of the story reason the scions haven't been around trials is they're usually (though not always) trials that they're not temper proof from. But Innocence isn't a trial, and if there is a third trial in 5.0 then it could also not be a primal. I think we're getting one more dungeon than normal so I wouldn't be surprised if that's coming at the cost of a third primal, so they can have say Titania EX in 5.0, Innocence EX in 5.1, and then start the expansions' trial story in 5.2.
Did they say if Titania was an actual primal? I think they did but I'm not 100% on that. And even if she is, they could still potentially have the Scions help like with Lakshmi in 4.1, especially if Titania turns out to not be an 'evil' primal that would try to temper willingly.


They will if I have anything to say about it.

If it's anything like the previous expansions I am pretty sure the two trials, Titania & Innocence, will be normal trials within 71-79 somewhere like the other two were. I.E Bismark/Ravana & Susano/Lakshmi. though I doubt they will be accessible via the Trust system as that would require 7 trusts. I think they are built only for 4-man dungeons right now. Also We will be getting more trials down the line as I would assume we'll have roughly 6-7 trials overall to play if not more. And don't think they reference her as a primal as of right now. Hell there wasn't any word on primals yet on the first.I wonder if it will include msq trials. Part of the story reason the scions haven't been around trials is they're usually (though not always) trials that they're not temper proof from. But Innocence isn't a trial, and if there is a third trial in 5.0 then it could also not be a primal. I think we're getting one more dungeon than normal so I wouldn't be surprised if that's coming at the cost of a third primal, so they can have say Titania EX in 5.0, Innocence EX in 5.1, and then start the expansions' trial story in 5.2.
Did they say if Titania was an actual primal? I think they did but I'm not 100% on that. And even if she is, they could still potentially have the Scions help like with Lakshmi in 4.1, especially if Titania turns out to not be an 'evil' primal that would try to temper willingly.
A being of great power, Titania holds sway over the pixies and other fae folk of Il Mheg─folk who, despite their notoriously temperamental natures, bow before their ruler one and all.
Feel free to hit me up at my discord: Fuji#9732



I just hope they'll be quicker on the shard servers if it gets bad. Like the Ixion solution.
WHERE IS THIS KETTLE EVERYONE KEEPS INTRODUCING ME TO?
Even if she is a Primal, there was one extra fact that occurred to me if they want to have trusts able to join us in MSQ trials:I wonder if it will include msq trials. Part of the story reason the scions haven't been around trials is they're usually (though not always) trials that they're not temper proof from. But Innocence isn't a trial, and if there is a third trial in 5.0 then it could also not be a primal. I think we're getting one more dungeon than normal so I wouldn't be surprised if that's coming at the cost of a third primal, so they can have say Titania EX in 5.0, Innocence EX in 5.1, and then start the expansions' trial story in 5.2.
Did they say if Titania was an actual primal? I think they did but I'm not 100% on that. And even if she is, they could still potentially have the Scions help like with Lakshmi in 4.1, especially if Titania turns out to not be an 'evil' primal that would try to temper willingly.
It's possible that the manner in which they have been called to the first may offer the Scions protection against Tempering as an alternative to the Echo. It's certainly something weird and new so could work in all sorts of strange ways.
Fairies and Angels - at least in the archetypes that Titania and Innocence seem to belong to - essentially temper people in 'real life'. It's what they do.
A slightly more disturbing thought is that, since they *aren't* primals in the normal sense of the word, the WoL herself may not be immune...



Everyone is trying to get through the content anyway, so why use trusts for the early dungeons? It's not like there would have been long queue times for that content....
But to that end, if anything, it would be the excessive number of people trying to create instances of those dungeons that would cause the issue, not trusts specifically.





I think it's more or less meant to give people an alternative if they are having trouble finding a group. Personally, I can't see me using them much unless there's some sort of achievement tied to them or something. I'll take gambling through the DF over the AI in this game any day. Well, probably. My patience could run out eventually.Everyone is trying to get through the content anyway, so why use trusts for the early dungeons? It's not like there would have been long queue times for that content....
But to that end, if anything, it would be the excessive number of people trying to create instances of those dungeons that would cause the issue, not trusts specifically.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote




