Would you rather have had Male Viera or Hrothgar?

[Bahati]

I'd would have preferred male viera. Hrothgar look like roe with animal heads and I wouldn't play a roe with a humanoid head.

I would say I would prefer female Hrothgar as well but that's me assuming they would have "Mithra" face and not an actual beast head as all MMOs tend to soften the beastial aspect of female counterparts (for better or for worse).

[Skivvy]

I'd would have preferred male viera. Hrothgar look like roe with animal heads and I wouldn't play a roe with a humanoid head.

I would say I would prefer female Hrothgar as well but that's me assuming they would have "Mithra" face and not an actual beast head as all MMOs tend to soften the beastial aspect of female counterparts (for better or for worse).

While they may soften the female Hrothgar a bit, I really hope they don't just put a humanoid face on it In my opinion, GW2 did a nice job with their Charr - both male and female. The females are a bit slimmer in the body, and their facial features can be a bit more delicate (at least on the one face I can visualize in my head ATM), but they stick to looking like proper Charr.

No offense to the Au Ra (I enjoy fantasiaing over to them quite often ), but I'd really like to never again see the extreme sexual dimorphism that we see with the Au Ra. If they're going to give us beastly men, give us the beastly females also.

That's just my take on it :X