Why having a dedicated MT and dedicated OT is a TERRIBLE idea

[whiskeybravo]

depend, if the reward is equal in both side then yes im ok, if its desigual then nope, SE make a big mistake by buffing WAR like that and don't adress DRK and PLD on that too, but leaving that apart this is a counter point of some ppl that argue OT and low enmity are related when the reality is not and this was a more or less equal situation at the begining that turn in to the adventage of WAR and later on DRK being more or less equiparable leaving the tank with a kit suited to a OT having worse pull of all tanks in the end.

Now we're making P R O G R E S S

Yes, it was unfair of SE (whether they knew it or not) to create such a disparity between the tanks in this particular area. But I think we can now agree that such a powerful tool is beneficial to tanking as a whole. It makes tanking more engaging to play (for people that enjoy contributing damage, at least), slightly more technical for those that like to optimize, and easy enough for newbie tanks to pick up and establish a strong lead against better DPS players. It has a lot more benefits than drawbacks. Really the only drawback isn't even in the ability, but in the disparity that only 1 tank can optimally perform in this area. All tanks would benefit from a strong "pull game".