wow I was once this innocent. But yes, depending on who you talk too there's MORE of them then helpful ones. I'm jaded so I lean towards most of them are horrible unless proven otherwise. Then again I feel like 90% of the game is horrible ingeneral so.... >.>I have a serious, unbiased question since I rarely deal with mentors, the novice network, etc etc.
One day I said into my FC chat that if anybody wanted help with clears related to Stormblood main-story dungeons, I would like to help because of boredom.
They said I should become a mentor because the mentor roulette gives "random content".
I responded by saying something along these lines (I don't have the chat log so I'm going off memory):
"I would need to be an exceptional player for that. The first step is knowing one's own limitations, correct? I don't consider myself a bad player, but I'm not exactly savage raid material either."
The first response was "I already like you better than any mentor"
That was a red flag for me. Are there *really* mentors running around who aren't....um...helpful?

If you provide meaningful rewards for being a mentor (beyond the joy you get from helping people), a lot of people who don't actually want to mentor are going to become mentors.


And unfortunately if you *don't* do that, then the queues they are trying to fill won't get filled.
This is a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation.
If you reward mentors by locking content, and giving them a crown - people who don't want to help will join
If you don't reward mentors - people wont be doing the roulette because it offers nothing
If the system is that flawed, why does it exist?
As I see it right now, it's a bunch of people who aren't trying to help, but trying to unlock content in the game.
If 90% of the mentors in the mentor roulette don't want to help people, then how is it really a tool to help new players?
I hate to put myself on the spot, but I'm a collector when it comes to games. The mentor system has a mount locked behind it, and some shiny "look at me crap". I'm the type of player that's being attracted to the mentor roulette. I've been playing for less them 6 months, and while I am good at all the healer jobs, that's basically it. I barely have any level 70 skills, and I'm more focused on the casual content (not that I don't wanna do the hardcore content, I'm just waiting for friends to catch up). I'm at best a novice that has mastered one role in the game, and has yet to do any of the high end EX content, but I'm 10 tank levels away from becoming one & I am going to become one as soon as I get those levels.
It's not that I don't want to help people, or anything like that, but my goal is simply to brute force my collectibles. I'm sure as time goes on, I'll become more bitter during the roulette because I'll see them as a chore that has content locked behind them.
Last edited by Hash_Browns; 04-11-2019 at 09:59 PM.


It exists for 2 reasons more than likely:This is a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation.
If you reward mentors by locking content, and giving them a crown - people who don't want to help will join
If you don't reward mentors - people wont be doing the roulette because it offers nothing
If the system is that flawed, why does it exist?
As I see it right now, it's a bunch of people who aren't trying to help, but trying to unlock content in the game.
If 90% of the mentors in the mentor roulette don't want to help people, then how is it really a tool to help new players?
1. The good of queues being filled/new players being able to do "dead" content as intended outweighs the bad of some bad apples.
And probably more importantly....
2. The system isn't broken, we (NA/EU) are. The system functions as it should on JP servers.



I see some issues with the whole mentor topic.
1. The ammount of bad mentors is not as high as some ppl claim. But the exaggerations are causing confirmation bias. There might be 30 silent mentors getting ignored, but the 1 guy with a crown complaining after a wipe gets remembered.
2. The definition of "bad" or "good" mentor is different for everyone. A Mentor telling a healer to "pls use some dmg spells" ... good or bad?
3. The expectations of what mentors should know are often really too high. I can explain every dungeon and every normal and hard primal, but if mentor roullette puts me into ex, i can´t help. So should I not do mentor roulette at all, even if im filling a healer slot for many dungeons with always instant invite?
4. Mentors cannot read minds. Even if the firsttimer message pops up, it could of course be a new person, but it could also be a 2. char from a vet. Maybe the sprout wants to run the content blind, maybe he wants explanation, maybe he is on voice com with a friend already explaining everything...


I think you are probably 100% correct Laphael.
4. Is easily solved. I just ask is everyone comfortable with the fight. Most times players that are new tell you they are new. then you can ask if they want or explanation or a lot of the time they go ahead and tell you.
My only complaint about the mentor system is that I need a Lv 60 from all roles. including land and hand roles, why do I need those?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.


Reply With Quote


