Results -9 to 0 of 319

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Player
    Renik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Limsa
    Posts
    821
    Character
    Ren'li Heise
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Gunbreaker Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by Senn View Post
    That's just anecdotal. I've seen plenty of people who would like a small male viera on the official forums and elsewhere - this is anecdotal as well. Neither of us know anything for certain.
    Oh sorry, I didn't mean that as an attack, I used 10 as an approximate number of the very active users I can see defending the shorter males on the forums, more than 5 less than 20, I know there are more (less active) users, the like count in the op espeaks for itself, but it's still a fact that the people with unknown preferences that asked for male viera (and probably are expecting the ones in the concept art that were shown alongside the current females to be implemented) utnumber by far the more active users asking for shorter male viera, a version that has not even been mentioned in any official statement, lore or concept art (feol aren't full viera and they are not shorter than famales, they are not even short, just shorter ears).

    Besides, a short male with animal features is something we already have with male miqos, and doing this to give the au'ra a counterpath it's absurd because the au'ra sexual dysmorphism wasn't even a good idea to start with, and again would only lead to a miqote body type, nothing new, and if they are even shorter than male miqotes, we can't even call them viera...

    On the other hand, i'm ok with an slider that goes under females min height but can get up to atleast the same max height as them, adding options is ok, limiting them is bad, that's the whole point of this campaign in favor of male viera and female hrothgar.
    (1)
    Last edited by Renik; 03-30-2019 at 01:02 AM.