That isn't what I meant. If we see MT and OT as tank subcatagories that would mean there are only too of each. If balance is a major driver that means that next expansion they should get at least one if we are using the justifications as ranged dps getting one now. I was asking that if Tanks are upset next expansion that they don't get a new OT or MT to balance their jobs at three, would you be supportive of their protests?
That is literally what I meant by variation in gameplay. The sole reason to add a new job is to add a different theme and feel to a particular role. The whole point of adding a new job is about pleasing the people who like playing that particular role by adding more variety to that role (or subroll). That literally was my point.
I think it is fair for healers to raise some issues and get addressed about them. This isn't happening in isolation. Yeah someone gets left out and that sucks for them and having that acknowledged is at least reasonable. However the bigger issue which is valid is the devs have used the justification of balance for why they were left out twice now and the last time they failed completely to deliver on the promises they made. That makes healer's sense of annoyance and scepticism that the reason they are getting left out is because of SE's own failures to deliver their promises pretty fair and something they should have addressed.
They said they will address the issue which is promising though we only got that in an interview when the issue was specifically raised, but Yoshi P also said they are going to make WHM easier to play which frankly is concerning. Of WHM's problems, difficulty of play isn't one of them. If anything it is one of the most simple jobs to play.
As a rule it is a bit much to expect the benefit of the doubt when you have a current track record of failure and are using the literal same excuses as before for not adding a job. I gave them the benefit of the doubt last time. They failed. This time it is on them to do the convincing.