Quote Originally Posted by ChocoFeru View Post
Voting against gender-lock: Decreasing game content such as less zones, less dungeons, less new jobs, less gear, less options.
Voting for gender-lock: Increasing game content such as more zones, more dungeons, more jobs, more gear, more options.

Because devtime and resources are a thing, and the priority should be the game quality before cosmetics.
This is a bad take because adding male viera and female hrothgar isn't cosmetics or aesthetics -- characterization is game quality and gameplay. If you don't agree, go change your Lala into a male roegadyn. Why not?

It's a question of priorities and not resources, and most players are giving respectful and succinct appeals to Square to change their priorities. What's wrong with that?