Results 1 to 10 of 15256

Dev. Posts

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Dhanauranji's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    38
    Character
    Almighty Dhanauranji
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Warrior Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Shiiruu View Post
    So what I'm getting from the latest interviews, is that Yoshida and FFXIV devs truly do not understand what we want and that genderlocking is an actual problem, and stereotypes are a problem... They're not doing this on purpose they're really just that narrow-minded. And here I thought they might have learned something over the years.. Oof.
    Although I agree the move is narrow-minded and sexist, calling them out on it aggressively isn't going to fix anything. We have to be respectful about it, expose our point of view and insist on having them see why this was NOT a right move. We can do this, I'm sure.
    (1)

  2. #2
    Player
    Vahlnir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Tent In the Middle of Nowhere
    Posts
    9,647
    Character
    Elan Centauri
    World
    Diabolos
    Main Class
    Gunbreaker Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Dhanauranji View Post
    Although I agree the move is narrow-minded and sexist, calling them out on it aggressively isn't going to fix anything. We have to be respectful about it, expose our point of view and insist on having them see why this was NOT a right move. We can do this, I'm sure.
    There is nothing sexist about this. Nothing at all. I would agree that they are at times narrow minded, but not in this instance. Time constraints was the reason that was given. That neither confirms their development or rules them out. Was is truly narrow mindedness? No one really knows. But they never said "we don't want to do this because reasons", they said that they ran out of time. Regardless, nothing about this is sexist. The word is being thrown around so freely that it sickens me. Apparently no one knows what it truly means around here. All of that said, I still think that there should be male Viera and female Hrothgar. And they very well could happen.
    (4)

  3. #3
    Player
    Dhanauranji's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    38
    Character
    Almighty Dhanauranji
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Warrior Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Vahlnir View Post
    There is nothing sexist about this. Nothing at all. I would agree that they are at times narrow minded, but not in this instance. Time constraints was the reason that was given. That neither confirms their development or rules them out. Was is truly narrow mindedness? No one really knows. But they never said "we don't want to do this because reasons", they said that they ran out of time. Regardless, nothing about this is sexist. The word is being thrown around so freely that it sickens me. Apparently no one knows what it truly means around here. All of that said, I still think that there should be male Viera and female Hrothgar. And they very well could happen.
    I could make a million excuses on why I didn't do something and it would still not be a reason. "Running out of time" is hardly an excuse nowadays, too.

    And hey, not saying they're sexist but that the move in itself is. Not considering people wanting to play the other gender can be misunderstood as such, even if you call "time" or "lore" as the factors to outright dismiss it, which are weak arguments to begin with (even more when they ran into that problem in 1.0 with Roegadyns, Highlanders and Mi'qotes, having players expressing their opinions once more).
    (5)

  4. #4
    Player
    Vahlnir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Tent In the Middle of Nowhere
    Posts
    9,647
    Character
    Elan Centauri
    World
    Diabolos
    Main Class
    Gunbreaker Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Dhanauranji View Post
    I could make a million excuses on why I didn't do something and it would still not be a reason. "Running out of time" is hardly an excuse nowadays, too.

    And hey, not saying they're sexist but that the move in itself is. Not considering people wanting to play the other gender can be misunderstood as such, even if you call "time" or "lore" as the factors to outright dismiss it, which are weak arguments to begin with (even more when they ran into that problem in 1.0 with Roegadyns, Highlanders and Mi'qotes).
    The move isn't sexist either. I could give a few descriptions of this move like "oh, that's a shame" or "that sucks". But calling the move sexist hurts your credibility considerably just like everyone else calling it sexist. And by hurting your credibility I mean making it basically nonexistent. If you people want to be taken seriously stop calling everything sexist.
    (3)

  5. #5
    Player
    Dhanauranji's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    38
    Character
    Almighty Dhanauranji
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Warrior Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Vahlnir View Post
    The move isn't sexist either. I could give a few descriptions of this move like "oh, that's a shame" or "that sucks". But calling the move sexist hurts your credibility considerably just like everyone else calling it sexist. And by hurting your credibility I mean making it basically nonexistent. If you people want to be taken seriously stop calling everything sexist.
    I think you have a problem with sexism as a whole, since you're now jabbing onto my credibility by being condescending (I mean, you're one hair short of an ad hominem there).

    "If you people", really? Take a chill pill, bruv.

    Also: ignoring you. I'm not gonna bring negativity to what has been a pretty awesome thread so far.
    (5)
    Last edited by Dhanauranji; 03-26-2019 at 01:11 PM.

  6. #6
    Player
    Vahlnir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Tent In the Middle of Nowhere
    Posts
    9,647
    Character
    Elan Centauri
    World
    Diabolos
    Main Class
    Gunbreaker Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Dhanauranji View Post
    I think you have a problem with sexism as a whole, since you're now jabbing onto my credibility by being condescending (I mean, you're one hair short of an ad hominem there).

    "If you people", really? Take a chill pill, bruv.
    Yeah, I have a problem with the word being used freely and poorly because I actually know what it means.
    (1)
    Quote Originally Posted by Naoki_Yoshida View Post
    Personal Housing
    While I cannot give a specific date on when personal housing will be implemented, I can say that prices will be completely separate from free company housing, and, naturally, far more affordable.

  7. #7
    Player
    Shiiruu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    25
    Character
    Ari Ingellvar
    World
    Phoenix
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Dhanauranji View Post
    Although I agree the move is narrow-minded and sexist, calling them out on it aggressively isn't going to fix anything. We have to be respectful about it, expose our point of view and insist on having them see why this was NOT a right move. We can do this, I'm sure.
    This is me being respectful.
    (0)
    Last edited by Shiiruu; 03-26-2019 at 01:24 PM.