Give the possible Eureka 5.X its own weapon, and separate Relic from it

[Nariel]

Did you actually finish Hydatos ? Or would you dimiss any lore connection as long as it's not the central plot of Eureka, which would then makes it even less accessible for players ?

So, what we got is in line with what he thinks, but you still claim it's not a proof...because he didn't say "Simon says" ?

I do, and I still wait to seen any correlation with my own weapon, who wasn't finished and not even in my inventory. I remember killing the bad guys with a weapon that lalafell dude throw me that IS a magical weapon tied to Eureka that won't serve any purpose for the relic one.

Nha was just sayin' I'm not putting much account to "I think people..." as a valid argument, especially from the director. He sure said Eureka is the new way of doing the relic, and for the 6th time how come it don't show up in game. Why the relic is so optional in its own content if the said content exist solely for the sake of the relic ?

[Reynhart]

I do, and I still wait to seen any correlation with my own weapon, who wasn't finished and not even in my inventory.

Again, the fact that you didn't do your weapon means nothing on how its existence is tied to Eureka. This is the first time that the items you get for upgrading the weapon actually have a reason to be there and can be used to make our weapons more powerful, to the point that it gains Eureka specific properties. Nothing in the past actually have any justification. All the various inks, crystals, atmas, etc... they come out of nowhere. And that's even without the nonsense of finding tens of thousands of Allagan tomestones everywhere.

Nha was just sayin' I'm not putting much account to "I think people..." as a valid argument, especially from the director. He sure said Eureka is the new way of doing the relic, and for the 6th time how come it don't show up in game.

From what I've seen, if you seek for a definitive answer from Yoshida, you'll never have it, because that's not how he communicates. But when what he thought three years ago ends up being what we got, doesn't it bother you to adamantly claim your opposite truth ? Without any actual proof on your end ?

Why the relic is so optional in its own content if the said content exist solely for the sake of the relic ?

I already answered that. Make the relic mandatory for the story and people will whine that the relic is mandatory for the story.