Regarding the Revision of the Prohibited Activities and Account Penalty Policy

[Sigma-Astra]

I am reading it and taking in both the tone and the context. I find it to contain aggressive language due to that. It reads as hostile.

I considered it relevant to the discussion at hand to point this out, as I would consider it a violation of the rules as written.

To further respond to the added parts of this response, I did see them all. I found most of your responses rude. As to your opinion on things being blown out the water. I disagree, though I maintain that your opinion is valid. I'm simply taking issue with how you chose to communicate it given the rules.

This whole situation ties in neatly with the request for more clarification on the new rules. That is all.

And I take issue with how the other person communicated their responses, which myself and another user, StarRosies, found just as rude and belittling. If you're going to chide one side of the spectrum, then you can't excuse the other person for their behavior simply because you have simply shown a bias towards that side of the field. His tone came off as rude and hostile, whether they meant it or not towards me is unsure, and Rosie caught that as well.

I'm not going to feel bad or apologize for stating an unpopular opinion, and then become ganged up on that opinion alone simply because a few people don't like hearing it. Especially, when I didn't use any terrible name-calling, shaming, bad memes, trigger words, trolling, etc... towards that aggressive individual.