Quote Originally Posted by Penthea View Post
Given their resources I'm pretty sure SE could present an incredible amount of proof of parser toxicity. And on the flip side an incredible amount of proof of parser positivity. SE made a call and that was to not have parsers. You would have to convince them to change their mind. And saying "I want parsers, prove to me they're toxic" will not change their mind, lol.
Burden of proof is what it is, regardless of how you diminish it, handwave it, and assign motivations to people supporting it. Sure, Square might not change their position on this, but that makes your posts equally as vapid, no?