About the Emperor [Major Spoilers for 4.4]

[Lauront]

Institutionalized racism, right there.

I'm failing to see the issue with it, but then I am not an SJW or a believer in blank slate fantasies.

Posters here have thoroughly explored the complexities, something which you seldom do. Talking down to people from your high horse without actually having any compelling arguments does not place you in good stead. You are, as always, entirely misrepresenting the positions of those who are arguing against your own.

Did you just come here to gripe? Because that's all you're really doing.

Cilia has been debated on this topic and I consider that Theodric usually goes to some pains to back his arguments through the lore. There are differences in how to interpret the events, Cilia has her spin on it, Theodric his; he is entirely correct in his assessment that Garlemald is more complex than some posters here would like to pretend. He's been debating this on and off for years. Does he need to list every single argument and point each and every time they come up again? If a poster feels they're being "misrepresented" then it's on them to try get their point through. They're not helpless little babes, incapable of doing so.

You, on the other hand, I recall having nothing of any merit to offer on the topic, and I doubt that is set to change. As such, on the topic of high horses, I'd suggest you go first in descending from yours.