See, this is much better
Then perhaps you shouldn't have tried to pass judgement and offer advice on something that you yourself admit you have little knowledge of. Also, you're not the only desktop enthusiast here, being one certainly hasn't precluded me from keeping up with developments in other fields.
Let's just say one silly statement deserves another and leave it at that. It's your right to believe whatever you want, but know that reality contradicts your belief.
Again with the exaggeration.... show me a desktop from 10 years ago that can handle today's game. FYI, that will be a Athlon xp/P4 system with a geforce 3. What games are you gonna run on that today? solitaire? Likewise, any system you built today is likely to be just as inadequate for gaming 10 years down the road.
PC gaming is an inherently expensive venture. The degree to which will vary greatly depending on what type of game one plays, but even then there are practical limits, and 10 years is way over the limit for most. Notebooks in general suffers from increased cost, nobody is claiming that's not true, but for some people the cost and other drawbacks is worth it for their particular usage.
time to do more homework again. I don't know where you're shopping for your tablets, but even Apple doesn't overprice their tablets THAT much. The Kindle Fire is a whopping $200, while the Transformer Prime, which will be the most power tablet when it hits the street here in a couple weeks, is still only $499.
As for prices and models, check the following sites:
www.xoticpc.com
www.malibal.com
both are fairly popular vendors with good range of selections. Also, none will "burn a hole through your desk and floor". Will some run hot? yea, but unless you're playing in a scorching summer heat to begin with, it's really a non-issue.
also, i think the term you're looking for here is "benchmark" (which doesn't change on a year by year basis btw) in which case:
http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-...M.48313.0.html
is one example. the 560m is comparable to a desktop gtx 450, so it'll remain adequate for as long as that does.
that's pretty much it, though re-application of thermal paste doesn't have to be done very often, maybe once every couple years, though some never bothered to change it.
I use a cooling stand not so much for the fans, but rather to elevate the laptop away from the desk surface, as most doesn't leave enough room underneath for proper airflow IMO
Unfortunately fermi isn't the coolest card in the world, and the physical proximity that comes with sli configs means even more restriction in airflow, especially for the upper card. I was spiking into the low 80s when I used to run 2x oc'd 5850s, so I understand where you're coming from. That being said, those cards are designed to operate at over 100C, and frankly my own reservation with the temp. has more to do with system stability rather than hardware longevity. Higher voltage is potentially far more detrimental than elevated operating temp.
done and done, though I certainly don't need, nor will I get, any "personal confidence" boost from this thread. I know fully well to what extent my knowledge in these fields go, which is simply something that's gained over the years by working with these stuff. Frankly you yourself sounds like you have as well, which makes this all the more baffling. There's nothing wrong with having a bias, but one shouldn't let that get in the way of being informed themselves - I greatly dislike Apple products in general, but that doesn't mean I don't know or acknowledge what they did get right.



Reply With Quote




