Quote Originally Posted by Vstarstruck View Post
Let me know if you fully understand the point, as I really hate seeing you debate with someone like Fyce with English not being your first language.
Thanks!
To be honest, right now I'm sitting here, shaking my head and are wondering who is actually missing the point - me or Fyce.

I'll conclude, at least for myself and after the given explantion, that its not me... because wether or not we agree on the definition of "new content" or figured out under what circumstances Eureka can be classified "new content", it doesnt change the fact that Eureka is uninsipred, not innovative, according to the devs the reason we got less other "new" content (cut back on dungeons), delayed the relic and is basically what they promised it wouldnt be: Diadem 3.0.
You can still think, that Eureka is new content, for all I care.
And you can enjoy that content and have fun with that - all power to you here!

But at the end of the day Eureka lacks innovation, new ideas and even proper rewards. All things that shouldnt have happend after 17 months. If anyone wants to dismiss those arguments based on how to define the word "new", they're probably not worth discussing with.

...am I getting all of this right?