
SCH is a healer, and you cannot que into a roulette or dungeon and have two of them unless you are a premade party of 4. That is the only way you can bypass the restrictions on them.



Tone it down a little. We've all caught on how he misremembered and edited to try and correct that.
He's got SAM and RDM at 50 and none of the other DoM/DoW classes he's unlocked after the PLD are above lvl 7. He wouldn't be able to get that type of experience even in the guildhests he might be able to queue into (I forgot what level you can).
Last edited by ExKage; 03-08-2018 at 03:39 AM.

Checking back on my logs it showed someone else was the scholar and someone else was the dragoon, so i apologize for the misinfo on my end, so yes she was the samurai, also the whole vote kick was mostly done by the DRG and her, only reason i'm saying the scholar didn't vote because she simply didn't say anything in chat that basing off my skill, if anything she was a bit weird of the some of the stuff she typed, like the bleach thing that kaldea mentioned.
Last edited by xMysticx; 03-08-2018 at 03:47 AM.



I will now try to address this properly but I think Kaldea answered it. Kaldea questioned why you would look up how to removing the icon next to your name tag and yet not want to look up how to do some of what others would consider to be the bare essentials of tanking. Having the answer of the game prompt told me how to hide it (I don't know if that's the case) is an answer?? I don't know.

Only reason i hid it was the same thing i said above, also i never looked it up my FC simply told us in chat how to hide it.I will now try to address this properly but I think Kaldea answered it. Kaldea questioned why you would look up how to removing the icon next to your name tag and yet not want to look up how to do some of what others would consider to be the bare essentials of tanking. Having the answer of the game prompt told me how to hide it (I don't know if that's the case) is an answer?? I don't know.

Yeah..some people are deliberately trollish with how they respond sadly..somehow they think because they are on the interwebs it makes it ok. Comments like that are most definitely reportable and should be. X.xChecking back on my logs it showed someone else was the scholar and someone else was the dragoon, so i apologize for the misinfo on my end, so yes she was the samurai, also the whole vote kick was mostly done by the DRG and her, only reason i'm saying the scholar didn't vote because she simply didn't say anything in chat that basing off my skill, if anything she was a bit weird of the some of the stuff she typed, like the bleach thing that kaldea mentioned.



This is also an acceptable answer to what Kaldea is asking. The point of Kaldea's question was "If person put the effort into finding out how to do this, why not something about their actual purpose in the game in a duty?" The answer is that you didn't have to expend any effort in finding it out. Your FC was helpful and informed you how to do it. It sounds like you didn't have any questions and thought your play was acceptable. Now, unfortunately through a large mess, you've learned that it's not.
They could have (depending on circumstances) kicked you earlier. It happened that one person wanted to try and help. Whether or not those windows worked out, it hasn't really been answered if there -was- a window. Open chest and being in battle means you can't.
It sounds like you AND Kaldea reported the scholar and the dragoon for their nasty and vile remarks so I do hope they learn to cut that out.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote



