They listen to us!! (Eureka)

[Vstarstruck]

Did you even read the reply? Instead of spinning words to try to make a false narrative you should start posting what was really said.


Holier than thou? Your condescending attitude has no place in this thread. You make claims without backing them up in any way shape or form. All you do is spew lies, yet you're the one clueless as to the situation and where it started.

I am not the one insulting people for a different configuration preference. Do as you wish with my advice, but the issue is with you, not how people chose to configure displays with the forum.

Lmao, "agenda".

The link tip was super useful actually, a true TIL. Most people would just say "nice, thanks" when someone points stuff like this out but instead we get an OP defending a link format for 5 pages, lmao.

don't forget insulting people* on top of things.

[Menriq]

Thanks for the link Mahrze.

[Ghastly]

If the Chinese and Koreans have the DOL/DOH Artifact gear then I get the feeling those are the first ones we'll get in Eureka, that's great news. Hoping for the bsm/arm artifacts.

I am not the one insulting people for a different configuration preference. Do as you wish with my advice, but the issue is with you, not how people chose to configure displays with the forum.



don't forget insulting people* on top of things.

Once again you need to stop making accusations without any prove. No one was insulting for having different configurations. You love making false accusations just because you think you can.

[alimdia]

lol OP still derailing his own thread? You know, you don't need to have the last word, you're just gonna end getting your own thread locked.

[Vstarstruck]

If the Chinese and Koreans have the DOL/DOH Artifact gear then I get the feeling those are the first ones we'll get in Eureka, that's great news. Hoping for the bsm/arm artifacts.


Once again you need to stop making accusations without any prove. No one was insulting for having different configurations. You love making false accusations just because you think you can.

It is clear you didn't read the thread at all. Anyone changing their posts per page settings are at fault here. If you bought a digital book which you could arrange differently it's up to you to change back to default. Instead some people here are getting into petty nuances just for the sake of argument

There is my proof, it is not what people chose in their settings, the issue is how you are treating people. This is also you insulting me, and you made a second post attacking me. Yes I did read, tyvm

[Charisma]

Because it's easier to be snarky with the kind of trite response that goes "You mean like this?" instead of, you know, actually informing them of how to more accurately link (and then pretending they were trying to be helpful all along).

You mean snarky for sensitive people, I mean seriously, how do people that get offended by this get through life?

This thread is the funniest thing I've seen all day, good job OP and all the other keyboard warriors arguing about linking posts instead of talking about the topic. 10/10

No one in this thread fits the definition of a keyboard warrior but meh... let's just throw around pointless words.

[Vstarstruck]

You mean snarky for sensitive people, I mean seriously, how do people that get offended by this get through life?



No one in this thread fits the definition of a keyboard warrior but meh... let's just throw around pointless words.

https://www.urbandictionary.com/defi...oard%20Warrior
I would argue the TC fits it. I would think for someone not fitting this, would not be arguing over people's display settings.

I agree with your point though, it was def used wrong.

[Ghastly]

lol OP still derailing his own thread? You know, you don't need to have the last word, you're just gonna end getting your own thread locked.

It's the OP derailing and not the others. The last thing this topic needs is more less informed statements.

There is my proof, it is not what people chose in their settings, the issue is how you are treating people. This is also you insulting me, and you made a second post attacking me. Yes I did read, tyvm

The quote isn't an insult it's a fact. No author of a book or someone citing a book will take into account people's devices and how they modify it (there could be hundreds of configurations). That's not an attack that's pointing out how changing settings is your own circumstance. I don't think you know what insults mean.

[Valkyrie_Lenneth]

The quote isn't an insult it's a fact. No author of a book or someone citing a book will take into account people's devices and how they modify it (there could be hundreds of configurations). That's not an attack that's pointing out how changing settings is your own circumstance. I don't think you know what insults mean.

Except you aren't citing a book, you are linking a post in a forum with hotlinks on each individual post.

[Ghastly]

Except you aren't citing a book, you are linking a post in a forum with hotlinks on each individual post.

Didn't I already tell you that you're starting arguments on nuances for no reason? You keep going in circles as if you weren't proven wrong/irrelevant already to the topic at hand.