Take it up with XIV's localisation team if you've got such a problem with it.The English dub of Advent Children had no problems with throwing in "planet". The problem with using "star" for both actual stars and planets is that it's just confusing. And fine, be as archaic as you want, but when people can no longer figure out what you're exactly referring to, by looking the word up in a dictionary, you've crossed the line.
When referring to a planet as a star, you're using the definition of "star" as "a small luminous dot in the night sky, whether alone or as part of a constellation", not as "a ball of burning gas". It's therefore not technically correct for Eorzeans to refer to Hydaelyn as a star.
I would, but sadly, I'm not part of the Balmung/Gilgamesh 1%, so all my feedback forms go straight into the shredder.
Anyway, to answer the OP's question: Maybe, maybe not. It would stand to reason that there are planets chilling out (relatively) near Hydaelyn, but if Hydaelyn's any indication, planets are all sentient gods. Or maybe all sentient gods are planets, but not all planets are gods, sentient, or otherwise. If there are other planets, they're not the focus of the story, so they're not mentioned.
That aside, if there were other planets, Eorzeans should know. Early astronomers, on Earth, could tell the difference between planets and stars because stars tended to stay in one spot in the night sky, while planets moved across it.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.



Reply With Quote

