Primals - A Discussion on Ethics & Philosophy (ARR & HW Spoilers)

[Anonymoose]

I think I'm just more offended that the story glosses over why it's ok for Shiva to exist when we need her, but it's not ok for [any other primal] to exist when [any other summoner] needs them.

If that's where you're focusing, I think we can still work through a few ... caveats? I guess? First we'll need to acknowledge that the people in charge of the scenario in all likelihood just though it'd be cool to have dragon waifu tap into her magical girl and fight out our side in glorious cutscenes. And now that we've acknowledged it, let's set it aside and pretend we didn't.

But Shiva is a unique case thanks to two overlapping factors.

First, her primal isn't essentially an overpowered Elemental with an independent volition that truly believes its a god, perpetually summoned and killing the land and tempering followers and falling into a positive feedback loop of survival and empowerment. Even Ramuh, the "peaceful" primal (for reasons that will be revealed in the future), still exudes a corrupting aura and encourages the divide between the sylphs and causes the aetherial decay of the land (as far as we know). By contrast, Ysayle uses short bursts of aether to manifest Shiva as a suit of armor and that isn't worn for very long. (Allegedly her ability to do this was by virtue of the Echo but the devs will neither confirm nor deny that Thordan somehow acquired it (perhaps via Elidibus the same way he granted it to the Sahagin elder) so we can only speculate speculate speculate.) We haven't seen many such primals (...yet? Though it seems too convenient of a plot device and would cause catastrophic retroactive villain decay, imho)

Second, Ysayle was using these short-bursts of summoning to follow the Warrior of Light's path: striking at the root causes of conflicts and ending them thereafter. Thordan might have been another primal-suit under mortal control, but he was going to antagonize and escalate global conflict. In the big picture, you could weigh the damage done by Shiva's summoning against the damage prevented and (by virtue of it being a short-burst summoning, under mortal command, wielded to uproot conflict) it would be a worthwhile purchase.

Perhaps the main reason it seems so hypocritical is because it's literally the only example and also serves as an exception.

This game does nothing to stop the cycle and that frustrates me, too. Beastmen feel threatened, so they summon. What do we do? Oh, we just threaten them more. We kill their god and bully them into submission. They certainly won't try that again!

This is ostensibly on track to go sideways in the future. Urianger threw a wrench into what the Warriors of Darkness were actually assigned to accomplish: defeating extremely powerful incarnations of the beast tribes' gods so utterly that it broke the tribes' faith in them and forced them to look to a "new god".

[Shai]

If that's where you're focusing, I think we can still work through a few ... caveats? I guess? First we'll need to acknowledge that the people in charge of the scenario in all likelihood just though it'd be cool have have dragon waifu tap into her magical girl and fight out our side in glorious cutscenes. And now that we've acknowledged it, let's set it aside and pretend we didn't.

Oh, believe me I understand this. As I said, Ysayle has been my favorite character for years, and her transformations gave me raging nerd-erections (TMI?) cause Shiva has been my favorite summon for even longer than Ysayle has probably been "alive" in-game. Her sacrifice made me literally cry when Haurchefant's just made me go "Oh that's just mean. I'll get you for this, you dirty knights." Allying with her was by far the absolute best part of HW story for me, so I feel conflicted whining about the details. Unfortuantely "wouldn't it be cool if...?" is such a crappy way to formulate a coherent plot. I think we can all agree to that. So yes, I set that obvious reason aside when analyzing character choices within the context of the game and its plot itself.

[Shai]

(Allegedly her ability to do this was by virtue of the Echo but the devs will neither confirm nor deny that Thordan somehow acquired it (perhaps via Elidibus the same way he granted it to the Sahagin elder) so we can only speculate speculate speculate.)

I speculate speculate speculate that Zodiark has a similar "blessing" as Hydaelyn that has been neither denied or confirmed yet.Probably weaker since Zodiark is sealed (or shattered or whatever technobabble state he is in) and Hydaelyn is not, but something the Ascians can bestow in-part to their followers. That's just my assumption, though -- since the most we ever get out of NPCs is "something like the Echo" and not an actual Echo.

To everything else you said - Yeah, I guess so. The other example I mentioned briefly and you [perhaps] overlooked is Louisoix. Though technically not a Scion ... and we maybe were never clear on his personal take on summoning itself, I feel we can extrapolate from his students that he thought the practice was bad and taught them to be against it. Still it didn't stop him from relying on it to "win" against a supremely powerful primal of destruction. Using your same analysis of Ysayle, though, Louisoix was the same -- and went so far as to keep Phoenix a secret so its existence wouldn't rally Eorzea to summon him in the future to fight their battles. His intent was a limited-time human-guided use and he also didn't use aether gathered from crystals but his (deus ex machina) Staff of Infinite McGuffins. So I suppose I have to accept your analysis is correct.

I'm glad we had this talk. =)

[Anonymoose]

I speculate speculate speculate that Zodiark has a similar "blessing" as Hydaelyn that has been neither denied or confirmed yet. Probably weaker since Zodiark is sealed (or shattered or whatever technobabble state he is in) and Hydaelyn is not, but something the Ascians can bestow in-part to their followers.

It's sound speculation. Elidibus and Lahabrea imply that they know much of the Echo, and Lahabrea's use of it has an ostensibly darker aura than ours. There's a singular counter-example that I can recall off the top of my head: Toto-Rak. Lahabrea here referred to the Echo has an "irksome anomaly", but I believe this may have been poor choice of words that slipped into the game through the final rush and was unable to be corrected due to the vocal track. Lahabrea is actually referring to powers in addition to the Echo - the powers of the Warrior of Light, or Champion. There's a similarly awkward translation later, when Lahabrea says the "gate to the void" is open, but it's actually the gate to the interdimensional rift (i.e. the Chrysalis) rather than the void (the Thirteenth). Also, when your power causes Lahabrea and Igeyorhm to be divided back out of Ascian Prime, Lahabrea curses you for re-establishing "Hydaelyn's walls" from which he was liberated by Zodiark - perhaps connecting to this hypthetical "Dark Echo".

It might not be weaker, though. Isolated though He is, Zodiark was stronger than Hydaelyn at the time of the division. According to Her, it's why She exiled him, and She's only grown weaker since. As Lahabrea hinted in the Praetorium, His return could "burn her out like a parasite".

This is also assuming that the Echo is addition rather than the subtraction. It's also possible that the Echo is a "plug-in" that disables inherent boundaries in the souls of mortals, thus removing limitations. This would make the source less relevant than how an individual subject responds to the augmentations.

The other example I mentioned briefly and you [perhaps] overlooked is Louisoix

As far as Lou knew, he just didn't have a choice. A direct impact from Dalamud was guaranteed annihilation, whereas summoning twelve deities at once was "merely" catastrophically bad. You can tell he didn't want to do it, and his hesitation (holding back, limiting it to harnessing their power before they could actually manifest) is part of why Bahamut was able to break through it. Have you ever seen one of those hostage scenes where the sniper shoots the hostage in a (hopefully) non-fatal location to prevent the hostage-taker from putting one in their head? I see it like that.