To be fair, the Garleans have goals far beyond merely defeating the primals. In fact, it can be very much argued that world domination, not defeating the primals, is their primary goal. They are largely interested in defeating the "Eikons' since they see such beings as one of the very few in the world who can resist their warmachina and the like. Given that several of their major defeats (Silvertear Lake, Baelsar's Wall) are directly related to primals makes this attitude somewhat logical, although their methods are truly abhorrent. That being said, they are massive hypocrites in their quest to defeat the primals, and their policies have done far more harm than good.
Gaius mocks the Eorzeans for relying on blind faith in higher powers and unleashing beasts they can't control. However, both he and the Empire go on to do that very same thing, putting blind faith in Allagan creations they don't understand and unleashing powers far beyond their power. They released Ultima Weapon, which would have done major damage to the world had the WoL not stopped it. They also attempted to capture the power of the Warring Triad, and it was shown that had they tried it would have been disastrous. And they also were the ones to unleash Bahamut on the world and cause a calamity. And their cruel treatment of the Ananta was the reason they summoned Lakshmi. And it's heavily pointed out that their expansionist, genocidal policies are what is causing the Beastmen to keep summoning their primals in the first place. (Especially the sylphs who have trouble differentiating between the 'iron men' and their peaceful Gridanian counterparts). Their methods for solving the primal threat are (currently anyway) inimical to both Eorzean life and sovereignty, and unfortunately with Varis in command that doesn't look to be changing anytime soon. Additionally, all attempts at diplomacy with the Empire have failed. They are effectively in a state of Total War with Eorzea, and have no current interest in any diplomatic solutions.
As for the whole 'some places have prospered' thing, I do have to say that maybe we shouldn't trust a couple of lines over a whole expansion worth of evidence. Even regions that have prospered will probably face several major issues due to the Garlean Ethos, such as the mass conscription, environmental damage, and other problems created by their pursuit of total war policies. Not to mention that non-Garleans explicitly are limited in how they could rise, with Rhitayn explicitly mentioned as being of the highest rank a non-pure blooded Garlean can achieve. They uphold a draconian caste system, and although people can rise through the ranks, it's explicitly much, much harder for those not of pure Garlean blood. As for not making peace in Stormblood, Ilberd's actions meant that the Garlean invasion would come again right quick. Would it be better to take the chance to free a horribly oppressed people? Or just wait for Garlemald to regroup and invade?


Reply With Quote





